The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  ISO 9000:1994
  Statistical methods in ISO 9001:2000

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Statistical methods in ISO 9001:2000
Jase Eyre
Forum Contributor

Posts: 13
From:Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 21 March 2000 07:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jase Eyre     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi y'all

A company here in Australia is sending out promotional material that states the following:

"Inevitable changes to ISO/QS9000 make the use of statistical methods compulsory to ALL organisations that wish to meet the standard. Don't let this become a burden, attend our seminars..."

I wasn't aware that statistical process control methods were 'compulsory' in the new standard. That certainly wasn't how I read it. Am I wrong?

------------------
JasE

IP: Logged

David Mullins
Forum Contributor

Posts: 248
From:Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 21 March 2000 08:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for David Mullins   Click Here to Email David Mullins     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
How else can you scare up some attendees to a seminar on stats? (rhetorical question - sorry)

9001:1991 Requires us to identify the need for statistical techniques required.
9001:2000 (draft) Requires us to determine the need for statistical techniques.
Identify vs Determine.
I believe ISO is merely re-enforcing the stance that if you don't apply statistical techniques then you must be able to prove (objective evidence) that such a determination took place, and that it is appropriate to your business.

Do you have measuring and monitoring systems?
Should you have measuring and monitoring systems?
If not, prove to me how you DETERMINED that there would be no benefit to the organisation or the customer in applying statistical techniques!

------------------

IP: Logged

Andy Bassett
Forum Contributor

Posts: 274
From:Donegal Ireland
Registered: Jun 1999

posted 22 March 2000 04:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Andy Bassett   Click Here to Email Andy Bassett     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Im not sure of the detail, but after my brief reading for the new standard i beleive that they are seeking more statistical or objective evidence that the system is working and that your customers are satisfied.

With this in mind i wont be lauching extra SPC activities, but i will encourage customers to gather more objective evidence(stats if possible) that all is well ie Customer Satisfaction Surveys, Measurements for each Process etc.

Regards

------------------
Andy B

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 22 March 2000 10:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by David Mullins:

Identify vs Determine.

I believe ISO is merely re-enforcing the stance that if you don't apply statistical techniques then you must be able to prove (objective evidence) that such a determination took place, and that it is appropriate to your business.

Do you have measuring and monitoring systems?
Should you have measuring and monitoring systems?
If not, prove to me how you DETERMINED that there would be no benefit to the organisation or the customer in applying statistical techniques!


I agree. Misinformation is rampany, especially when some lamer is trying to hawk their software, seminars, canned procedures and such.

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 22 March 2000 10:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Andy Bassett:

....i beleive that they are seeking more statistical or objective evidence that the system is working and that your customers are satisfied.

With this in mind i wont be lauching extra SPC activities, but i will encourage customers to gather more objective evidence(stats if possible) that all is well ie Customer Satisfaction Surveys, Measurements for each Process etc.


I separated SPC from Statistical Techniques long ago. SPC is only 1 of many, many possible statistical techniques. I think you're making a wise decision.

IP: Logged

Laura M
Forum Contributor

Posts: 299
From:Rochester, NY US
Registered: Aug 1999

posted 22 March 2000 10:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Laura M   Click Here to Email Laura M     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Let me qualify my statement by saying I haven't read ISO9000:y2k. Having said that, I wonder if the emphasis on continuous improvement is of the same vain as in QS9000...page 19...."the supplier shall develop a prioritized action plan for continuous improvement in processes that have demonstrated stability, acceptable capability and performance" Note above provides further clarrification. This would imply uses of statistical analysis.

Just a thought...again, I don't know the CI language in ISO9000:y2k

Laura

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 22 March 2000 11:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Laura M:

....This would imply uses of statistical analysis.


I have only had 2 clients who got away with no statistical techniques. Both were small ( <20 people) and could show they considered possible places to use statistical techniques but did not feel (believe or whatever) that statistics would benefit them. Auditors have a hard time with this (as do I to some degree) however the requirement was not, nor do I believe it is in the new version, outright required. Reality is larger companies have little choice. Like the US Census, to 'measure' the country (quite a few people and since everyone won't stand in one place for a year or two so they can be counted 1 by 1) requires (despite republicans requiring adhereance to an outdated interpretation of 'Talk to every single sole') statistical analysis techniques. On the other hand, to inventory your house and the houses of 2 of your neighbors ONLY really doesn't lend its self to statistical analysis unless you plan to interpolate the findings to predict what you will find in the country as a whole (population prediction).

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!