|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums 
|
|
|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
 The New Elsmar Cove Forums
 ISO 9000:1994
 Revision levels
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Revision levels |
|
Marchi Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 1 |
posted 10 July 2000 02:05 PM
   
I was wondering if ISO (or ANSI for that matter0 offers any guidance on recommended methods for document revision names. IE: should the rev level be "A, B, C" or is it OK to use "001, 002, 003" etc. as the revision level of our documents? Thanks ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Jim Biz Forum Wizard Posts: 275 |
posted 10 July 2000 02:18 PM
I've sure never seen anything on guidance from change numbers/letters standpoint - as long as the change is identified and current levels can be shown - in a clear way - IMHO it should not make a difference. Regards IP: Logged |
|
Paul Vragel Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 6 |
posted 11 July 2000 05:19 PM
I agree there is no "right" way. If the revision will somehow end up as part of your electronic file name, also be aware of sorting order (a rev list with revs 001, 002,etc. may eventually sort as 1,11,12,13,...18,19,2,21,22,..., depending on how you structure the name/numbers. May or may not be an issue in your environment, but avoiding this type problem up front can save a lot of headaches later. I agree there is no "right" way. ------------------ IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
Main Site Search 
