The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  PPAP Capability Study

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   PPAP Capability Study
Chantal P Tardif
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 3
Registered: Sep 98

posted 05 September 1998 09:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Chantal P Tardif   Click Here to Email Chantal P Tardif     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have a supplier to who I am requesting a PPAP submission. The only thing is that he is telling me that he can't do a full capability study since it takes 100 samples to performe the capability study. His process is producing conductor paste. So he produces a big batch once per three or four months. So he is telling me that his capability study would take over a year to do. So my question is the following, could this study be done on a 100 samples of this batch to verify the resistivity and viscosity in that same big batch to see the overall capability and then a long term capability study over the variability of this process from batch to batch. I'll wait for anyone response since I would require both but I don't want to be out of line. Thanks for your help!!!

IP: Logged

Howard Atkins
Forum Wizard

Posts: 202

posted 05 September 1998 11:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Howard Atkins   Click Here to Email Howard Atkins     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I dont see why he cannot take samples every half hour or so and measure the capability like this.
In plastic injection I produce a large number of parts in a lot and I take the capabilities according to these individual pieces.
The point as I see it is to show that the process is stable and thus to take samples at a reqular interval shows the stability of the process.

IP: Logged

Forum Contributor

Posts: 22
From:Cranford, NJ
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 15 March 2001 03:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Casana   Click Here to Email Casana     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I know this is an old thread but it is similar to my current question...
We manufacture semiconductor devices, several thousand devices are created at the same time on a wafer.
For us to collect samples from 100 wafers is not practical - the time to run them would be months, and the cost would be huge.
So... can I just collect a lot data points from 3-5 wafers and estimate a Ppk, in order to submit the PPAP? The customer for this particular product is not an automotive one and they are not requiring PPAP (but our QS registration does!)
Thanks for any input.

IP: Logged

Al Dyer
Forum Wizard

Posts: 622
From:Lapeer, MI USA
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 15 March 2001 03:57 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Al Dyer   Click Here to Email Al Dyer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

I assume by your post to the APQP/PPAP forum that you are already a tier I supplier to automotive.

Do you have two systems for part submission, one for automotive and one for non-automotive?

If you do, it sounds like a problam waiting to happen. I believe that if there is only one system to follow, there will be alot less headaches and confusion.


IP: Logged

Forum Contributor

Posts: 37
From:Wellington, OH USA
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 16 March 2001 07:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for D.Scott   Click Here to Email D.Scott     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Casana - Are you certain your QS registration requires you to do PPAP submissions for non automotive customers? My understanding is the instructions of the customer over-ride all requirements. If your customer states in a quote request that PPAP is not required, I don't think you can be held to PPAP requirements. Like Al says, two seperate systems is looking for trouble so we do "PPAP" as part of APQP even if it is not required. Some of the others would be more informed on this but IMHO, I don't think the QS requirement needs to compel an expensive study. I would use my ongoing process data to illustrate capability.

IP: Logged

Forum Contributor

Posts: 25
From:Princeton, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 16 March 2001 08:13 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for AJLenarz   Click Here to Email AJLenarz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Your description of the product (conductor past, one batch every 3-4 months) would be considered ăBulk Materialä. The PPAP rev 3 addresses this in Section I. In a nut shell it states, if you canât or donât have capability, you must do 100% inspection. 100% inspection means an evaluation of samples(s) of product that is representative of the entire production run.

Make sure his control plan states that 100% inspection will be perform in lieu of capability.

Does this clear things up?

IP: Logged

Forum Contributor

Posts: 22
From:Cranford, NJ
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 16 March 2001 08:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Casana   Click Here to Email Casana     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
OK, I re-read the PPAP requirement. It DOES state in Note 2 that the Customer & Supplier need to agree on what index to use.
NOW - the next question is... what index is appropriate for processes that don't lend themselves to easily collecting 25-100 samples/lots in a timely/ cost effective manner? ie - Do manufacturers of equipment have to do Cpk's or what do they use??

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!