The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  APQP and PPAP
  Ppk is Preliminary Process Capability ?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Ppk is Preliminary Process Capability ?
Brad Lee
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 3
From:Singapore
Registered: Sep 1999

posted 07 September 1999 07:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Brad Lee     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
(I crossed post this from the Stat Techniques Forum as I think the topic applies to both.)

The 2nd edition of PPAP says we are suppose to calculate "Preliminary Process Capability" in the form of Ppk, and yet the SPC Ref. Manual says Ppk is "Process Performance" while Cpk is "Process Capability". So what gives?

Also by the definition of Ppk and Cpk formula, Ppk value cannot be greater than Cpk since the "sigma" in Ppk includes both common and special causes of variation. And yet the acceptance for Ppk is supposedly 1.67 but for Cpk it's 1.33.

Anyone's got an insight to this???

IP: Logged

Batman
Forum Contributor

Posts: 111
From:Kane, PA 16735
Registered:

posted 08 September 1999 04:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Batman   Click Here to Email Batman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The way I interpret this is Ppk is a one time, early-in-the-project short capability of a few hours or so. The Cpk is usually calculated from a longer timeframe, days or weeks for example. If you have a "short run" of a couple of hours with a capability index of less than 1.67, it is presumed that a longer study will result in added variation, thus lowering the eventual long term capability index. I believe this is why the higher requirement for the Ppk.

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 19 February 2001 06:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
For a good thread on Cp, Cpk, Ppk, etc., see:
https://elsmar.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000001.html

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!