The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  APQP and PPAP
  APQP " Key Contact on Control Plans"

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   APQP " Key Contact on Control Plans"
Frank45
Forum Contributor

Posts: 11
From:Pontiac, Il
Registered: May 99

posted 17 February 2000 02:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Frank45   Click Here to Email Frank45     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
We are a manufacturing plant with Hundreds Control Plans in use. We recently had a organizational change that effected the Key Contact/Phone Item #7 requirement in APQP. What is a painless way of addressing this requirement to avoid updating control plans when primary contact personnel is changed?

IP: Logged

billsfan
Forum Contributor

Posts: 19
From:Kane, Pa., USA
Registered: Aug 1999

posted 17 February 2000 03:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for billsfan   Click Here to Email billsfan     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Frank,
Instead of using the person's proper name - use the postion title ie; Mfg. Eng. or Q.A Mgr. They names and faces may change but the resposibilities stay with the position.
Hope that helps!

IP: Logged

Mike525
Forum Contributor

Posts: 49
From:
Registered: Apr 99

posted 17 February 2000 04:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mike525   Click Here to Email Mike525     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
billsfan:

The APQP Manual specifically calls out for a name and telephone number of the primary contact responsible for the control plan. I'm not sure if a position title alone meets that criteria.

Does anyone else out there use position titles alone and been audited by their registrar and not get a nonconformance?

Frank45: I know no one ever asks my opinion any more, but do you think simply posting or attaching a "controlled" sheet to the control plan which identifies the new key contact would be sufficient, and we identified the process in our FSIP that the name will be updated directly on the control plan the next time it is revised? Just thinking out loud.

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 17 February 2000 04:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've only seen them with a position, a specific name and a phone number.

IP: Logged

Howard Atkins
Forum Wizard

Posts: 202
From:Israel
Registered:

posted 18 February 2000 12:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Howard Atkins   Click Here to Email Howard Atkins     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As you do not have to resubmit the control plan for each change but merely keep an updated copy, and the name is there I beleive for mainly the PPAP stage so that there can be contact if neccesary, after the PPAP usually the responsibility moves from the engineering to the production and anyway the name changes. Use a blanket letter that shows the change, file it with the control plans and update when you update further infomation.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!