|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
![]() Measurement, Test and Calibration
![]() ISO 10012-1 4.10 Confirmation Labeling
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: ISO 10012-1 4.10 Confirmation Labeling |
|
cjkurtz Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 6 |
We really don't want to put labels on our gages. We are pursuing QS-9000 at one plant and ISO 9002 at another. We do precision machining of engine and gear parts, and have about 10,000 special gages, air gages, ring, thread, plug, mikes, etc. Can you give us some advice about this? IP: Logged |
|
Batman Forum Contributor Posts: 111 |
No doubt about it, your measurement / test equipment must be identified "...with a suitable indicator..." as to its calibration status. QS9000, 4.11.2.d Note that the note in 4.11.2.d states a serial number traceable to a calibration record is acceptable. Our system is to put the due date on all gages. We have done this for years, and has worked. We have only about 1,000 total controlled gages. Prior to that we tried colored stickers and paint dots. Too complicated, though, so we found stickers that STUCK and just put the due date on it. It would be difficult to not have some form of serialization in place, particularly when you must demonstrate bias, linearity, adjustment trends, etc., for each gage. If you have 10 similar pressure gages, for instance, is one more or less used than another? Is one wearing out more than another. IP: Logged |
|
barb butrym Forum Contributor Posts: 637 |
the ID number, and a circulated/posted cal report by area works well......Also color coded markings for month due works too. IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
