The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Measurement, Test and Calibration
  Hardness testing of Ceramic Fibre Shapes

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Hardness testing of Ceramic Fibre Shapes
Brian Dowsett
Forum Contributor

Posts: 35
From:Waterford, Ireland
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04 September 2000 10:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Brian Dowsett   Click Here to Email Brian Dowsett     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Folks.
Has anyone found a way to measure hardness of ceramic fibre shapes?. We buy crucibles for high temperature melting, which we would like to control for hardness. However, checking with a standard durometer gives a lot of measurement system variation and certainly would not meet normal gauge variation requirements. Obviously checking repeatability is difficult because each time the gauge is used in an area, it makes an indentation - meaning that the reading in that area cannot be repeated. However, meeting the requirements for doing the study is not my major concern- i'd just like a better way to measure product quality.

For info, the shape is cylindrical, about 3 inches in diameter.

Thanks

brian

IP: Logged

Jerry Eldred
Forum Wizard

Posts: 136
From:
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 04 September 2000 06:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jerry Eldred   Click Here to Email Jerry Eldred     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I will have to defer this one, as I am not an expert in this area. The only minor point I noted is that perhaps on a particular sample, you could take multiple readings, and for each reading, use an untouched surface area of the sample. Perhaps you could establish a minimum number of readings that would provide you with acceptable measurement variability. I do recall from my limited exposures to Rockwell Hardness standards, that they are not very stable. My recommendation would be to seek out some industry experts. It may be that you could refine measurement methodology, and add some metrology engineering to the measurement (i.e.: devise some details to how you perform the reading such as sample placement, penetration depth, variations on probe tip used and other such details - not being an expert on this, I won't make any specific recommendations). Is there a hardness standard available with a similar hardness rating that you could use to develop methodology.

Just a bit of rambling to try to add something. Apologies that I can not be of much use in this matter.

------------------

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!