The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line

The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove ForumsThe Elsmar Cove Forums
  17025, Guide 25, A2LA (Cal., Meas., and Test)
  Acceptance criteria for Linearity and bias studies

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Acceptance criteria for Linearity and bias studies
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 2
From:Bangalore, India
Registered: Jun 2001

posted 29 June 2001 05:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Raghav   Click Here to Email Raghav     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
We are analyzing the measurement system at a facility that manufactures engine valves. Data collection for linearity and bias studies have been done in accordance with the MSA manual. What inferences can be arrived at from the attained values of slopes and bias? Are there acceptance criteria/standards on which conclusions can be drawn

IP: Logged

Forum Contributor

Posts: 10
From:Welland, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 06 July 2001 11:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Neil   Click Here to Email Neil     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I posted a query on acceptance criteria for linearity in May in this forum. I have heard of two reasonable sounding criteria. One is linearity as expressed as percentage of the part tolerance range should be less than 10% (sort of an extension of the old 1/10 resolution rule of thumb). The other criteria is, measurement uncertainity in the reference standard (usually a very small number) + Gauge R&R + linearity or bias must be less than 30%. Using linearity if the measurement device is used over a range or bias if it is used only at one point in the range. All of these above are expresed as a percentage of the tighest tolerance range on the part/drawing that device measures. None of these is official but as long as you document these criteria you will in all probability be one step ahead of the auditor. If you think about it, this means that 30% of the tolerance range is being consumed by measurement uncertainity alone! I hope this helps.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Marc Smith | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Please Visit the new Elsmar Cove Forums! All these threads are there and much more!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!