The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line

The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove ForumsThe Elsmar Cove Forums
  17025, Guide 25, A2LA (Cal., Meas., and Test)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Calibration
David Davis
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 2
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 22 August 2001 10:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for David Davis   Click Here to Email David Davis     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Our company is in the process of registering to the ISO standard. We are approaching our pre-assessment audit. My question concerns the calibration of "all" gages. Does every gage company or employee owned have to be calibrated. We are leaning towards "no", due to time and MONEY. Are there any companies out there currently not calibrating "all" gages and using a "reference only", "process validation", or "transfer gage" procedure for some of your gages and how is it working for you? Has it ever been an issue during an audit? Thank you for your time and consideration. - Dave Davis

IP: Logged

Sankaran Mahadevan
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 4
From:Jamshedpur, Jharkand, India
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 22 August 2001 11:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sankaran Mahadevan   Click Here to Email Sankaran Mahadevan     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The Standard whether ISO / QS 9000 is very clear in this matter. Any gauge / instrument or for that matter even fixtures used in production has to be either calibrated or verified before use or at a specified periodic intervals. You have to calibrate all the instruments or gauges that you use for production. In other words you have to calibrate all measuring equipments as they might affect the quality of the final products.

You can decide upon the frequencies of calibration depending upon the usage of that particular equipment. But you have to calibrate them. No other go.


Sankaran Mahadevan

IP: Logged

Forum Contributor

Posts: 58
From:Lilburn, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 23 August 2001 12:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Graeme   Click Here to Email Graeme     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Any gage (tool, measuring instrument) that is used to determine acceptance of a quality characteristic of the product must be calibrated. The calibration must be traceable to national measurement standards, or to another accepted standard.

A test I use is this (adapted from P. G. Stein) --
Does it matter if the measurement is wrong?
If yes, then calibrate the instrument.
If no, then why are you making the measurement?

Axiom: it is always lower cost to determine acceptance of a characteristic at the earliest possible stage of a process. Final inspection is always the second most expensive place to find a problem. (The most expensive place to find a problem is at the customer's place after delivery.)

If you only have calibrated tools at the final inspection point you are, in my opinion, setting yourself up for a lot of rework.

In some companies and industries it is historical practice to use tools that are marked "For Reference Only". (I work in one of those companies.) I disagree with this for several reasons.

  • Putting calibrated and "reference only" tools in the same work area creates a monster control problem. There must be absolutely zero possibility of a "reference only" tool ever being used where a calibrated tool is required. Getting caught once is at least a minor nonconformance. Having it happen several times is a major nonconformance because the system does not work. The consequences could be worse if people's lives are put at risk.
  • A rationale used for this practice is that the "reference only" tool is "only used for" troubleshooting, or maintenance, or alignment of the system, or only by Facilities and not by Production, or (and so on). Sorry, but I don't agree. I have done all of those types of work and in every one of them I have wanted some assurance that the meter is correct. This can also cause a lot of rework. For instance, if you align a system with a "reference only" meter but it does not pass the system checkout with calibrated instruments, then you have to align it and check it again.
  • There are cases where a calibrated tool may not be "required" but is an important safety factor. An electrician, for example, probably wants to be very sure there really is no voltage on a wire before she grabs it!

Notice that the key factor is how the tool is used, not who owns it. There is no intrinsic problem with employee-owned calibratable tools, provided they are in the calibration system.

Yes, calibration can be expensive. It's a business decision. But as part of the decision you should factor in the potential cost of not doing it, especially if a failure of your product or service can put people's lives at risk.

[This message has been edited by Graeme (edited 23 August 2001).]

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Marc Smith | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Please Visit the new Elsmar Cove Forums! All these threads are there and much more!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!