The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Miscellaneous Quality Topics
  Prioritized reduction plan

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Prioritized reduction plan
Dawn
Forum Contributor

Posts: 245
From:St. Marys, PA
Registered: Sep 98

posted 29 July 1999 05:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dawn   Click Here to Email Dawn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just had assessment audit. Everything went well -16 minors.
But I took a hit for not having a prioritzed reduction plan on scrap not being corrected by corrective action. If corrective action hads been taken, I cna't use that. He wants to see a reduction plan on the scrap we do nothing with. Any ideas?

IP: Logged

TheOtherMe
Forum Contributor

Posts: 64
From:West Chester, OH USA
Registered: Jul 1999

posted 29 July 1999 06:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for TheOtherMe   Click Here to Email TheOtherMe     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
QS or ISO?

IP: Logged

Dawn
Forum Contributor

Posts: 245
From:St. Marys, PA
Registered: Sep 98

posted 01 August 1999 09:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dawn   Click Here to Email Dawn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
QS

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 01 August 1999 10:03 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think what they are looking at here is the theory you are never at a point where scrap is eliminated - so - they ask for a 'plan'. Your plan would be based (at least in part) upon identified nonconformances, not a single nonconformance and it would be 'living' (that is it will change with time as new nonconformances are identified). Reviews and updates of FMEAs and control plans would probably be part of the plan.

Did you ask where (specifically - paragraph number, etc.) in QS9000 this is a stated requirement?

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!