The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Miscellaneous Quality Topics
  Rating Quality System Foundations

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Rating Quality System Foundations
Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 28 September 1999 11:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Subject: Re: Reference to C+ /../Kozenko/El-Homsi/Kozenko
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 13:40:02 -0600
From: ISO Standards Discussion

From: Write9000@aol.com
Subject: Re: Reference to C+ /../Kozenko/El-Homsi/Kozenko

> I would like to know of any references that refer to the C+ rating. Our
> process includes many items not covered in ISO (e.g. Malcolm Baldrige type
> items such as continuous improvement, problem solving, business planning,
> effectiveness...) I find it interesting that the score of C+ corresponds
> well with the large number of suppliers that we assess that are ISO
> certified that score in the 70-80 range. I believe that review of any
> reference documents would be an interesting benchmark for our internal
> process, as well as possibly yielding some useful information in educating
> our management and "customer's"

I "grew up" in the quality days of MIL-Q-9858A, which is a general specification for a quality assurance/quality control system. I watched and learned as my superiors (good teachers -- all P.E.s employed by Parsons Brinckerhoff) reviewed, commented on, and gained responses to their comments in their reviews of QA/QC Quality Systems presented for approval under that specification. I watched and learned, too, as those quality systems failed at times, for various reasons. (And to keep a long story short...) Then I became charged with an ISO9000 Implementation task, and I was delighted with the challenge of discovering the existence of MIL-Q-9858A in my own organization, and the "gaps" between that and ISO9000, and Deming, Juran, Crosby, et als. For about a year and a half, I immersed myself in the world of quality systems and standards, to the point where I found myself talking way above the heads of those who were supposed to be listening to me (and that was my fault, in retrospect). But from all that absorption, I could draw my own "shoot from the hip" conclusion that the MBNQA with all its dynamic interactive relationships between requirements, was at least an A-, and MIL-Q-9858A which lacked some very important required elements that only make common sense (such as Document Control, the only one I can think of "off the top of my head") must therefore equate to a D+ if done very well, and a D- or less if not so. It stood to reason then, that even a mediocre implementation of ISO9001 should qualify as a C-, and because I have observed first hand a number of ISO9001 implementations and found none of them to be merely mediocre, then it stood to reason that ISO9001 should hold the minimum grade of C+ when first implemented, and further, that such "academic scale" grade would increase proportionate to the length of time an ISO9001 QMS was implemented, by virtue of the operation of continuous improvement (which is a "built in" characteristic of ISO9000). (btw exposure to QS9000 leads to a B+ in this same analogy).

So if you're looking for a quote from an ISO9000 textbook edited by Peach (whom I highly admire) then I can only disappoint you there. The C+ rating for ISO9000 QMS's is merely an "IMHO Kozenko," albeit accurate I'd bet.

Commentary invited.

David M. Kozenko

IP: Logged

barb butrym
Forum Contributor

Posts: 637
From:South Central Massachusetts
Registered:

posted 04 October 1999 12:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for barb butrym   Click Here to Email barb butrym     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
hey, my friend dave...the old philosopher.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!