The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Miscellaneous Quality Topics
  Taguchi quality loss function

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Taguchi quality loss function
Geoff Cotton
Forum Contributor

Posts: 34
From:Staffordshire, England
Registered: Jun 2000

posted 22 June 2000 06:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Geoff Cotton   Click Here to Email Geoff Cotton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In simple terms, how do I establish the 'Consumer Loss' element of Taguchi's Quality Loss Function equation?

Thanks in advance

Geoff

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 24 June 2000 06:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I hope one of the others can help here - I'm sorry I can't.

IP: Logged

Kevin Mader
Forum Wizard

Posts: 575
From:Seymour, CT USA
Registered: Nov 98

posted 27 June 2000 01:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kevin Mader   Click Here to Email Kevin Mader     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am not familiar with this item, but here is what I am thinking.

Precise optimization of a process or system is not desireable. At some point, the return on the preventive measures taken to control an item will eventually be too costly to be practical. When one does not consider this, maximization can occur and costs begin to rise. Needless to say, these costs go somewhere, some of which or all of which lands in the consumers pocket.

I hope I haven't muddled the works up.

Regards,

Kevin

IP: Logged

John C
Forum Contributor

Posts: 134
From:Cork City, Ireland
Registered: Nov 98

posted 30 June 2000 07:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for John C   Click Here to Email John C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Geoff,
Like Kevin, I have only a vague idea about Taguchi's work. What little I did know has faded into the dim past but, from what I remember, it is not simple and there is no simple way to deal with it. You may have seen the discussions about 6 Sigma and noted how, out of ten people you can get ten different ideas about what it is supposed to be. Now Taguchi, I would say, was a very clever and experienced person who knew just about everything that had been written about variables. Some of it is sure to be pretty difficult for the layman but, Taguchi, having absorbed all that stuff, rolled it over in his mind for years, and teased it and worried it until he came up with a new way of looking at it. If we can't agree about 6 Sigma, what chance have we with Taguchi unless we begin with an understanding of the theory and thought process that led him to his conclusions?
I suggest you start by reading anything you can get hold of that relates to Taguchi's work. Then, having identified the areas where your knowledge isn't sufficient to take you on, go back and pick up the knowledge you need.
The worst thing you can do is drive on with a smattering of knowledge and expect to achieve anything useful. Most people can draw wrong conclusions from a histogram.
rgds, John C

IP: Logged

chris chatfield
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 5
From:Gimo, Sweden
Registered: Jun 2000

posted 03 July 2000 04:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for chris chatfield   Click Here to Email chris chatfield     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Geoff,
Regarding the use of the Taguchi Quality Loss Function good references are:
1) Quality Engineering using robust design,
author: Madhav S. Phadke, Publisher: Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-745167-9. Especially Chapter 2
2) Introduction to Quality Engineering,
author: Genichi Taguchi, Pub: Asian Productivity Organisation, ISBN 92-833-1084-5

The Quality Loss function can be used both internally, i.e. to provide motivation for own improvements, and externally, i.e. to motivate improvements to satisfy and keep customers. In the first case one has good knowledge of own manufacturing costs and can readily use the function. In the case of the benefit to an end user one can try to identify benefits from own knowledge of end use if this is sufficient or by asking the customer or by performing a bench marking to see where own competitors stand. It is clear that this is a delicate problem as an over ambitous attempt to staisfy a customers demands can result in own bankrupcy!

Moving to an aspect of the Loss Function I would like to get an answer to. This quantity can be used to motivate investments to improve quality as a cost per unit for poor quality can be calculated. In these days of adherence to 6sigma philosophy this idea should go home with upper management who generally only priority productivity gains when investing. Does anybody know/have references to such a use of this function?
Help!
Regards, Chris.

IP: Logged

Geoff Cotton
Forum Contributor

Posts: 34
From:Staffordshire, England
Registered: Jun 2000

posted 04 July 2000 03:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Geoff Cotton   Click Here to Email Geoff Cotton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Chris,

Thanks for your reply.

I think your question is where I'm trying to get to, i.e. how to apply the Loss Function to 6 Sigma. Looking forward to the replies.

Geoff

IP: Logged

chris chatfield
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 5
From:Gimo, Sweden
Registered: Jun 2000

posted 07 July 2000 10:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for chris chatfield   Click Here to Email chris chatfield     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hallo again Geoff,
Had to start doing some homework on the Quality loss function.
I became aquainted with this topic when I read D. J Wheeler's book "Beyond Capability Confusion: The average Cost-of-use", SPC Press, ISBN 0-945320-51-5.
Essentially Wheeler's message is that this quantity has nothing to do with Conformance to Requirements/Zero Defects/Cost of Quality/Six-sigma/Capability targets/etc. What he is advocating is that this quantity should be minimised by assuring that all processes are on target and have minimum standard deviation. As such any programme that aims at this will reduce ACU, but one formally does not have to adopt such a programme to use ACU. Wheeler recommends the use of standard SPC practices: i.e. process in control, correctly centered and with the correct tolerances. See pages 79 to 106 in the book.
The problems I have run into when trying to convince our economists is that they cannot accept a coupling between quality and production costs. Instead I have been asked to try to estimate and base a calculation on quality control costs.
Regards again,
Chris

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!