The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Controlled Prints

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Controlled Prints
Forum Contributor

Posts: 245
From:St. Marys, PA
Registered: Sep 98

posted 01 October 1998 07:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dawn   Click Here to Email Dawn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If the master print is stamped controlled, do we need to control the prints in Engineering and Quality also? If they are not stamped controlled, do they need to be signed and dated?

IP: Logged

Howard Atkins
Forum Wizard

Posts: 202

posted 02 October 1998 01:07 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Howard Atkins   Click Here to Email Howard Atkins     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If the prints in the other departments are not controlled then how can you guarantee that they will be changed if the master print is changed?
IMHO the document control system must apply to prints to ensure this factor.

IP: Logged

Forum Contributor

Posts: 245
From:St. Marys, PA
Registered: Sep 98

posted 03 October 1998 07:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dawn   Click Here to Email Dawn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Walk me through this: If the prints in the Safe are stamped controlled, then the copies go to Engineering, and Quality. When they are stamped controlled, they cannot have markups on them whether signed and dated or not. The prints in Engineering and Quality can have markups without being signed and dated. They know they have the proper revision because they can compare the print to the print in the safe at any time. There is a procedure stating the Office Assistant controls the prints in the safe and copies the master to Engineering and Quality. Are we in compliance? Why or why not? Thanks, after you look at this stuff so many times you forgot what you did know.

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA

posted 04 October 1998 08:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Your control system has to address the prints quality and engineering have. They are able to be marked up. So what? Are these to be changes to be submitted via an Eng Chng Notice (or whatever you call them in your system) or what? How does one know which markups are submitted for change on an ECN? How does one know how many 'copies' are out there? They 'CAN compare their 'copy' to the one in the safe but what triggers an engineer or quality person with a copy to 'check the safe'? Are the 'copies' marked 'COPY' or anything? Is there more than 1 copy of the same print floating around engineering or quality?

I would say off hand you are not in compliance if your system does not define these copies, how they are used, etc. My problem is that they are obviously making decisions based upon them and secondarily I would want to know more about the markups - how made, how used, etc.

IP: Logged

Don Winton
Forum Contributor

Posts: 498
From:Tullahoma, TN

posted 04 October 1998 09:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Don Winton   Click Here to Email Don Winton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

My take on this. Original prints need not be stamped, only identified as controlled. What I have done is that originals are not stamped. The FDA requires a Device Master Record (in another incarnation, I called this the Design Master Document), which is the control point for all documents. My procedure states that ãissued documentsä are controlled, engineering and document control are exempt (after all, there should be working drafts). Maybe, Maybe not.

Best Regards,

IP: Logged

Leslie Garon
Forum Contributor

Posts: 27
From:Chicago'ish, IL, USA
Registered: Oct 98

posted 05 October 1998 11:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Leslie Garon   Click Here to Email Leslie Garon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sounds like you've got a small mess on your hands. My advice is similar to Marc's. Make sure you document when a change is allowed, who is authorized to make the change, which copies must be changed, and what must occur as a result of a mark up.

The simplest way to manage this is to say, no markup will be made by unauthorized personnel only under certian conditions that are followed up by proper distribution/markup or all other prints identically and a formal change taking place like a ECN, ECO etc.... This you can prove to an auditor. It is controlled although a bit of a pain.

Mark ups must be communicated effectively and followed up with a formal change process to get the master up to date appropriately. Keeping the master in a safe is one way of handling revision control but how do you know that the copy in engr. or QA is the current revision. Is there a master list? or do you have a very controlled distribution process that you can prove that the other copies are always at current revision?

A rule I try to follow with my clients is no markups (permante/formal changes only) without formal change resulting documentation (ECO etc) and all copies existing being marked up identically, signed & dated. This means that a temporary change is not indicated on a print, but on an accompanying document that expires.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!