The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  QM: 1994 or 2000?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   QM: 1994 or 2000?
ed wink
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 2
Registered: Oct 1999

posted 20 October 1999 12:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ed wink   Click Here to Email ed wink     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
New to the ISO universe (and the board), hi. We are beginning the process of updating our quality system, looking to register to ISO9002:1994 (ISO9001:2000), but not until mid/late next year. We have an older, seldom referenced manual, that i am using as a starting point. Should we pattern our documentation after the current standard (only to change later), follow a CD2 draft, or should we just START anywhere?

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA

posted 20 October 1999 01:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Start anywhere you like. If you want to pattern after the CD2 draft, go ahead. I worked with a company that registered in June - we had tailored their systems manual after the CD2 draft. There's a draft systems manual posted on the site if you look.

IP: Logged

Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 4
From:Jacksonville, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 09 November 1999 09:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bob   Click Here to Email Bob     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am the "ISO 9000 Implementation & Plans Manager" at a large govt. production facility (4,000 employee, $800M per year facility). With our timeline phasing of our different business units, we have chosen to format our "Business System Management/Quality Management System (BMS/QMS) manual to ISO 9000:2000. It also better describes a business-based process. Since several of our production units will be ready for ISO 9000:1994 registration before the release of ISO 9001:2000 version, we will include a cross reference table showing the relationship of the 1994 standard to the 2000 standard (included in CD2). When the 9001:2000 version is released, we will have the certificate for these business units "flipped" over to the new standard. We figured that minimizing confusion and retraining in the workforce was as important as the ISO 9000 process. Most of our level 2 and 4 documents are in place (the govt. at least documents things whether right or wrong but it does baseline things for continuos improvement). We are also strengthening our level 3 procedures.

IP: Logged

ed wink
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 2
Registered: Oct 1999

posted 09 November 1999 09:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ed wink   Click Here to Email ed wink     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Has anyone addressed new requirements yet? As a small manufacturer, we aren't sure what a procedure for legal requirements, information, or defining our infrastructure, would mean for us.

IP: Logged

Roger Eastin
Forum Wizard

Posts: 345
From:Greenville, SC

posted 10 November 1999 08:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Roger Eastin   Click Here to Email Roger Eastin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ed - if I were you, I'd wait for the Draft International Standard (DIS) to come out. This is especially true for the legal requirement which I understand has been changed to some degree. Being a small business, you want to make sure that you only cover what you have to. I don't think much, if anything, will change for the bulk of the 2000 version from CD2 to DIS and you are probably safe implementing CD2. However, not being sure what will change, I would wait. We're only talking a few more weeks anyway before the DIS comes out.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!