The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
  The New Elsmar Cove Forums

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   ECN/ECO
Forum Contributor

Posts: 38
From:Manila, Philippines
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 20 March 2001 01:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Raffy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi Everyone,
I am a new from this site. I was delighted and happy that there is a place like this wherein I could ask questions then in return I can also make a comment.
So far I'm working on the Documentation of our Document control procedure, revising and pull-out things that were not applicable on our system. I'm having a problem in documenting an ECN that shall be incorporated in our current Document Control System.
It starts with this: Whenever we made changes in our document/drawings/setup-sheets, we make use of the ECN (Engineering Change Notice)...we have an effectivity date reflected on the ECN...however when we generate the standard operating procedure for a document control there is another date reflects to it.
My concern(s):
1. Are we going to have the effectivity date equal to the effectivity date on the generated specs? (Note that we have in our current specs is five days allowance for effectivity date) Please advice.
2. I'm also having a problem how am I gonna change the format?
3. How am i gonna show the effectiveness of our Documentation System?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,

IP: Logged

Al Dyer
Forum Wizard

Posts: 622
From:Lapeer, MI USA
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 20 March 2001 03:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Al Dyer   Click Here to Email Al Dyer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You posted:

"ECN...however when we generate the standard operating procedure for a document control there is another date reflects to it".

Do your standard operating procedures list the related documents?

I don't know your system, but we make note of the document to be used in the operating procedure but do not list the effective date of the document. Therefore when we use a level III document (form) and fill it in with the required information it is now a level IV document (evidence) that is stored under 4.16 Record Retention.

There is no need to change a document revision level on a form that is stored for evidence.

As an example:

We have a generic in-process inspection form qs-111 that is not specific to any part. When a product needs to be inspected the form is pulled from the document database and completed by the inspector.

The completed form is stored without issuing a new revision level. It is merely evidence that that we did what we said we would do.

The original form is still at the current revision level.

Now, if we re-design the level III inspection form it goes through a document approval process and is issued a new revision level.

Sorry for being long winded, but document control systems need to be designed to work within the scopes of specific company structures. I don't think that one system is better than another as long as people understand the process and it is effective within the given situation.


IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!