Z
ziggyroo
My compnay is trying to decide whether to be ISO or TS certified.
Is there a big difference between the two?
Is there a big difference between the two?
Fist off - Welcome to the Coveziggyroo said:My compnay is trying to decide whether to be ISO or TS certified.
Is there a big difference between the two?
ziggyroo said:My company is trying to decide whether to be ISO or TS certified.
Is there a big difference between the two?
I stand humbled and corrected sorry Bill. Thanks Wes.Wes Bucey said:The scope and assumption changes are really quite significant. There are two changes in scope. The scope must list the company’s automobile customers and may include any that do not subscribe to ISO/TS 16949:2002, as long as their product meets the applicability requirements of the standard. In other words, if the product is part of the automotive supply chain, that customer can be included in the scope.
The second change, which may have a larger implication, is the requirement that ISO/TS 16949:2002 can only be applied to automotive organizations and that an ISO/TS audit can be conducted only for the automotive products of a company. Thus, if an organization produces automotive and farm equipment in the same plant and requires the total plant to be certified by a third party, there needs to be a split-scope audit performed, using ISO/TS 16949:2002 for the automotive product and ISO 9001:2000 for the farm equipment. The IATF even remarked that there needs to be two quotes applied for such an organization. This clarifies the content of the scope statement and what is detailed on the certificate.
According to www.worldpreferred.com , GM has a large number of sites certified to ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001. Some sites have QS-9000 and TS.qualeety said: