x-files
Involved In Discussions
Hi,
Sometimes I'm not sure who is (or should be) the process owner.
Imaginary scenario:
-holder/founder company
--Thermal Powerplant1 (CEO1)
---ThermoBlockA (Director of A)
---- Sub-process1 (Manager of Sub-process1)
---- Sub-process2 (Manager of Sub-process2)
---ThermoBlockB (Director of B)
---- Sub-process1 (Manager of Sub-process1)
---- Sub-process2 (Manager of Sub-process2)
--Thermal Powerplant2 (CEO2)
etc...
For example, who is the proces owner of "Sub-process1", that is inside "ThermoBlockA" in "Thermal Powerplant1"? Is it "Manager of Sub-process1" or "Director of A"?
Similar, who is the process owner of whole "Thermal Powerplant1". Is it "CEO1" or "some director of a founder company"? "Thermal Powerplant1" produces energy by plan of holder/founder company, not by it's own vision.
The misapprehension is because of this:
"Sub-process1" does not exist because of itself. It exists because of "ThermoBlockA", and all it's activities are in function of "ThermoBlockA". "ThermoBlockA" is commanding to "Sub-process1"?
On the other side, "Sub-process1" has the person ("Manager of Sub-process1"), that is the most responsible for all activities in "Sub-process1".
Furthermore, who is the process owner for "Internal Audits"? Internal Audits could be called by any Director in the company, for it's scope of activities. But, the most responsible person to establish THE PROCEDURE Internal Audits is, let's say, Management representative, which in fact mainly starts the process of Internal Audits for the whole company as scope.
So, is the process owner the one to whome the process is necessary (caller, sender), or the one who is the most responsible inside the process, as a person to maintain the order in the process?
Or, as always, it's up to us to decide
Best Regards,
Vladimir Stefanović
Sometimes I'm not sure who is (or should be) the process owner.
Imaginary scenario:
-holder/founder company
--Thermal Powerplant1 (CEO1)
---ThermoBlockA (Director of A)
---- Sub-process1 (Manager of Sub-process1)
---- Sub-process2 (Manager of Sub-process2)
---ThermoBlockB (Director of B)
---- Sub-process1 (Manager of Sub-process1)
---- Sub-process2 (Manager of Sub-process2)
--Thermal Powerplant2 (CEO2)
etc...
For example, who is the proces owner of "Sub-process1", that is inside "ThermoBlockA" in "Thermal Powerplant1"? Is it "Manager of Sub-process1" or "Director of A"?
Similar, who is the process owner of whole "Thermal Powerplant1". Is it "CEO1" or "some director of a founder company"? "Thermal Powerplant1" produces energy by plan of holder/founder company, not by it's own vision.
The misapprehension is because of this:
"Sub-process1" does not exist because of itself. It exists because of "ThermoBlockA", and all it's activities are in function of "ThermoBlockA". "ThermoBlockA" is commanding to "Sub-process1"?
On the other side, "Sub-process1" has the person ("Manager of Sub-process1"), that is the most responsible for all activities in "Sub-process1".
Furthermore, who is the process owner for "Internal Audits"? Internal Audits could be called by any Director in the company, for it's scope of activities. But, the most responsible person to establish THE PROCEDURE Internal Audits is, let's say, Management representative, which in fact mainly starts the process of Internal Audits for the whole company as scope.
So, is the process owner the one to whome the process is necessary (caller, sender), or the one who is the most responsible inside the process, as a person to maintain the order in the process?
Or, as always, it's up to us to decide
Best Regards,
Vladimir Stefanović