B
blindfreak
Dear fellow users,
I ran a rank regression with MiniTab and wonder how to interpret the following output:
Rank Regression: Ideal Employ versus ENVTL. IMPAC; ENVTL. MGMT.; ...
The regression equation is
Ideal Employer Rank = 62,3 - 0,434 ENVTL. IMPACT - 0,251 ENVTL. MGMT. +
0,121 DISCLOSURE - 0,000052 Revenue $ mio - 0,000460 Profit $ mio
Coefficient Coefficient
Predictor Rank Least-sq Rank Least-sq
Constant 62,35 60,53 12,82 11,48
ENVTL. IMPACT -0,4337 -0,4139 0,1233 0,1104
ENVTL. MGMT. -0,2509 -0,2359 0,1681 0,1505
DISCLOSURE 0,12094 0,11792 0,07291 0,06529
Revenue $ mio -0,00005237 -0,00005447 0,00002430 0,00002176
Profit $ mio -0,0004601 -0,0004552 0,0002741 0,0002455
Hodges-Lehmann estimate of tau = 8,808 Least-squares S = %2
Unusual observations
Ideal
ENVTL. Employer
Observation IMPACT Rank Pseudo Fit SE Fit Residual
27 24,2 25,00 27,51 14,31 7,44 10,69 X
X denotes an observation whose X value gives it large leverage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The H0 hypothesis is that corporate environmental performance does not determine perceived company attractiveness, i.e. I want to show that objective environmental performance values (my independent continuous variables) do have an influence on corporate attractiveness ratings (my dependent variable).
So far, I learned that I have to look at the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of tau in order to reject my H0 (the lower the value, the better). Unfortunately, I don't know which value of tau allows me to reject the H0. Is there something like a general rule, e.g. when the Hodges-Lehmann estimate is lower than 5 then the H0 can be rejected?
Many thanks!
Linus
I ran a rank regression with MiniTab and wonder how to interpret the following output:
Rank Regression: Ideal Employ versus ENVTL. IMPAC; ENVTL. MGMT.; ...
The regression equation is
Ideal Employer Rank = 62,3 - 0,434 ENVTL. IMPACT - 0,251 ENVTL. MGMT. +
0,121 DISCLOSURE - 0,000052 Revenue $ mio - 0,000460 Profit $ mio
Coefficient Coefficient
Predictor Rank Least-sq Rank Least-sq
Constant 62,35 60,53 12,82 11,48
ENVTL. IMPACT -0,4337 -0,4139 0,1233 0,1104
ENVTL. MGMT. -0,2509 -0,2359 0,1681 0,1505
DISCLOSURE 0,12094 0,11792 0,07291 0,06529
Revenue $ mio -0,00005237 -0,00005447 0,00002430 0,00002176
Profit $ mio -0,0004601 -0,0004552 0,0002741 0,0002455
Hodges-Lehmann estimate of tau = 8,808 Least-squares S = %2
Unusual observations
Ideal
ENVTL. Employer
Observation IMPACT Rank Pseudo Fit SE Fit Residual
27 24,2 25,00 27,51 14,31 7,44 10,69 X
X denotes an observation whose X value gives it large leverage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The H0 hypothesis is that corporate environmental performance does not determine perceived company attractiveness, i.e. I want to show that objective environmental performance values (my independent continuous variables) do have an influence on corporate attractiveness ratings (my dependent variable).
So far, I learned that I have to look at the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of tau in order to reject my H0 (the lower the value, the better). Unfortunately, I don't know which value of tau allows me to reject the H0. Is there something like a general rule, e.g. when the Hodges-Lehmann estimate is lower than 5 then the H0 can be rejected?
Many thanks!
Linus
Last edited by a moderator: