Y
Yarik
Hello everyone!
I have to admit that my current understanding of processes and process approach is still very shaky (to say the least ). But it's getting stronger, bit by bit - thanks to invaluable help from this great community.
Here are some questions that I was pondering lately:
---
(Q1) Let's say, there is an activity that is important enough to deserve a documented procedure describing how this activity is carried out. It seems to me that such an activity has to belong to at least one process that is important enough to be identified (and therefore described in QMS documentation).
---
(Q2) ISO 9001:2008 requires documented procedures for the following 6 activities:
---
Thank you,
Yarik.
I have to admit that my current understanding of processes and process approach is still very shaky (to say the least ). But it's getting stronger, bit by bit - thanks to invaluable help from this great community.
Here are some questions that I was pondering lately:
---
(Q1) Let's say, there is an activity that is important enough to deserve a documented procedure describing how this activity is carried out. It seems to me that such an activity has to belong to at least one process that is important enough to be identified (and therefore described in QMS documentation).
NB: In some cases, such an important activity can itself be identified as a process (and described in QMS documentation as such).
Would you agree with this "theorem"? If not, why? Any examples?
---
(Q2) ISO 9001:2008 requires documented procedures for the following 6 activities:
- control of documents (4.2.3)
- control of records (4.2.4)
- internal audit (8.2.2)
- control of nonconforming product (8.3)
- corrective action (8.5.2)
- preventive action (8.5.3)
---
Thank you,
Yarik.
Last edited by a moderator: