MickPetzold
Returning Poster
John, that was our original scope with the exception of design because we do not design and develop new services. (Our services are performed to contractual requirements, technical specifications, and/or industry standards established by our customers, regulatory bodies [e.g., OSHA], and organizations that administer applicable voluntary standards [e.g., NFPA, ANSI/NETA, IEEE, etc.])Mike,
As well as this scope for certification:
“The management of inspection, test and maintenance activities on high-voltage electrical power equipment and systems to assess and ensure their suitability for initial and continued service, all of which is performed in our main office.”
I recommend a broader scope for your management system:
“The design, performance and management of inspection, test and maintenance services on high-voltage electrical power equipment and systems to assess and ensure their suitability for initial and continued service.”
That is you want your management system to help your organization to assure the quality of your services while continually improving your services.
Best wishes,
John
The issue is, if our scope includes PERFORMANCE of services, our CB is obligated to audit that, and many of our customers will not let on site for safety and/or security reasons. Further, our CB will not audit our field service because of safety considerations. So, after posting here and the suggestion from AndyN, and confirmation from a large CB, excluding performance of service is a typical way to handle these situations. Let's hope ANAB agrees!