C
cytokinesis
I'm seriously at a loss here.
Before I start, don't chime in with something like "Overall residual risk evaluation is the point where residual risk is viewed from a broad perspective."
Please just don't
Scenario A
The first analysis lends itself to modularity, and so I've broken it up into about a dozen sections. Each section has its own set of hazard identifications, estimations, controls, and residual risk assessments. All of the hazards in each section have been mitigated, and the residual risks are acceptable.
So far so good.
What exactly does an examination of overall residual risk look like? Its not like I have any new hazards to add.
My thought was to take the most severe risk from each section, put the 12 of them onto one risk table, and demonstrate that all of them fall within the acceptable zone.
That seems a little pointless, since its just a repetition of information from the lower-level analyses, but I'm honestly not sure what further steps are expected.
Scenario B
Assuming my plan for scenario A makes sense, what does "overall risk" mean in a smaller scenario when all of my hazards are considered in one risk study?
Any clarity you guys can give me on this subject is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Before I start, don't chime in with something like "Overall residual risk evaluation is the point where residual risk is viewed from a broad perspective."
Please just don't
Scenario A
The first analysis lends itself to modularity, and so I've broken it up into about a dozen sections. Each section has its own set of hazard identifications, estimations, controls, and residual risk assessments. All of the hazards in each section have been mitigated, and the residual risks are acceptable.
So far so good.
What exactly does an examination of overall residual risk look like? Its not like I have any new hazards to add.
My thought was to take the most severe risk from each section, put the 12 of them onto one risk table, and demonstrate that all of them fall within the acceptable zone.
That seems a little pointless, since its just a repetition of information from the lower-level analyses, but I'm honestly not sure what further steps are expected.
Scenario B
Assuming my plan for scenario A makes sense, what does "overall risk" mean in a smaller scenario when all of my hazards are considered in one risk study?
Any clarity you guys can give me on this subject is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.