Disagreements on Quality Policy

L

linthorn

#1
I'm trying to develop the policy statement for our 9k2k registration. After reading the posts here, and searching the web, I have found numerous QPs which are vastly different. The problem is that many of the policies I have found, which state that they are 9k2k don't seem to fulfill the requirements of section 5.3. Probably the most egregious is from the Marshall Space Flight Center:

MSFC Quality Policy
“MSFC policy is to provide quality products and services to our customers through the Marshall values: people, customers, excellence, teamwork and innovation.”

This is from their 9k2k page (to which they are certified). Help me if I am misunderstanding. I don't see compliance to 5.3.b, either on the requirements or to a QMS (which isn't even mentioned). The policy we currently have is something like:


"...to consistently ensure customer satisfaction and loyalty by continually improving our ability to meet or exceed our customer's expectations for professional expertise and knowledge-based services and support."


Although I don't like this, I can't say that is inferior to MSFC's. Am I right that this policy is asking for a NC?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
A

Aaron Lupo

#2
Re: Dissagreements on Quality Policy

linthorn said:

I'm trying to develop the policy statement for our 9k2k registration. After reading the posts here, and searching the web, I have found numerous QPs which are vastly different. The problem is that many of the policies I have found, which state that they are 9k2k don't seem to fulfill the requirements of section 5.3. Probably the most egregious is from the Marshall Space Flight Center:

MSFC Quality Policy
“MSFC policy is to provide quality products and services to our customers through the Marshall values: people, customers, excellence, teamwork and innovation.”

This is from their 9k2k page (to which they are certified). Help me if I am misunderstanding. I don't see compliance to 5.3.b, either on the requirements or to a QMS (which isn't even mentioned). The policy we currently have is something like:


"...to consistently ensure customer satisfaction and loyalty by continually improving our ability to meet or exceed our customer's expectations for professional expertise and knowledge-based services and support."


Although I don't like this, I can't say that is inferior to MSFC's. Am I right that this policy is asking for a NC?
How do you know what the Marshall Values are? Maybe the Marshall values include continual improvement, customer satisfaction etc...?:confused:
 
E

energy

#3
This one?

MacDougals is committed to maintaining a customer focused Quality Management System that:

* Produces products and services that meet customer/regulatory requirements

* Is communicated from Top Management to all levels of the organization

* Continually monitors to improve all aspects of our Quality Management System

They shun the "exceeds" customer/regulatory requirements because it can't be verified. Came right out of the standard. No?

The policy statement is also auditable so you have to be able to back it up. JMHO

:p :ko: :smokin:
 

gpainter

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
To meet and excede customer expectations would certainly include a commitment to C/I and customer satisifaction
 

CarolX

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#5
let us look again

Hello linthorn and welcome to the Cove.

I gather from your post you are trying to satisfy the requirements of 5.3 in one short and sweet paragraph. Well, I think you can and probably have....

"...to consistently ensure customer satisfaction and loyalty by continually improving our ability to meet or exceed our customer's expectations for professional expertise and knowledge-based services and support."
5.3.a is appropriate to the purpose of the organization

Looks ok to me...your purpose is to satisfy the customer.

5.3.b (paraphrase here) comply with requirements and continous improvement

Looks good...you address customer satisfaction (complying with requirements) and continual improvement.

5.4.c provides a framework for establishing and reviewing objectives.

Does your system provide for this, i.e. your Quality Manual, procedures, work instructions. I may be off base, but where does is state in the standard that these details should be in the policy? Paragraph b is the only on required to be included in the policy.

5.4.d is communicated and understood

Again, this should be covered in training documents.

5.4.e reviewed for contiuing suitablity

And once again, covered by your supporting documents.

I equate the Quality Policy to be nothing more than a glorified tag line, like the old Zenith tag line "The quality goes in before the name goes on".

Don't do too much of this

:frust: :frust: :frust:

JMHO,
CarolX
 
M

Michael T

#7
I hear ya!!

linthorn,

Welcome to the Cove. You have indeed come to the right place for lively discussion on this issue and a wide variety of others.

I feel your pain!! I've fought the same battle. Carol is right on the money.

It seems to me that a Quality Policy should be something that is easily remembered by all personnel of the organization. Afterall, isn't the Quality Policy the verbalization of the spirit of the organization? So, the way I see it, if it is too wordy (and it will be if all those items from element 5.3 are included) no one will remember it, let alone understand it. It becomes too cumbersome. I know the guys on my shop floor would never remember something that is more that 2 (short) sentences long. :ko:

I've gotta agree with Energy on this one too... (I've been agreeing with him alot lately... :confused: ) The word "exceed" is extremely difficult to verify. While exceeding customer expectations is a noble goal, if you aren't doing it (and/or don't have a way to verify you are or aren't) you've got a N/C on your hands.

Cheers!!!
 
L

linthorn

#8
Here's the thing

Thanks for all of your replies. I had read the referenced thread on the plans vs objectives. Here's my sticking point: Doesn't section 5.3 require things be addressed in the Quality Policy? Although I agree that a simple, to the point policy is best, 5.3 (b) requires that the policy address "requirements" and "continual improvement of the QMS". The policies I included failed to address these things. Our policy can be deemed to include requirements, and it does reference improvement, but I am unsure about if the QMS needs to be specifically referenced.

I do agree with the "exceeds" issue. No one ever believes it even if we do support it "110%"

How about the fact that the policy only addresses our "ability" to do work, rather than the performance of said work?

I do appreciate your help. We are a small company and putting ourselves through this process is a little daunting. We are working with a consortium, but I like to understand what we are doing. I get tasked with selling it to our people.:bonk:
 
M

M Greenaway

#9
Linthorn

Quality Policies are a great place to debate semantics.

As you have noticed yourself they are all different, and you might expect them to be so as they are supposed to be the unique view of the company on how it sees 'quality' within its organisation. However as you have rightly identified ISO9001:2000 does give you some apparent mandatory inclusions for your policy.

In order to save time at audit debating semantics (probably best left for here in the cove !) it is a good idea to use the words of the standard as far as possible. So if it says 'include a commitment to continual improvement' simply include these words i.e. the organisation is committed to continual improvement of the QMS blah blah blah.

You could argue that your policy which states that you plan to exceed customer expectations necessitates continual improvement of the QMS. i.e. if your QMS is currently meeting their requirements and you change nothing you will at best just continue to meet requirements. If however as you say you will exceed requirements your QMS will have to be improved. So I think you have covered the requirement but you might have to argue your case.

As for the distinction between 'ability' and 'performance' there is perhaps little difference as an assessment of ability is surely based on an analysis of performance. Again you could argue your policy covers performance.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R How would you work without a quality management system? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
P Conformity assessment based on a quality management system or production quality assurance EU Medical Device Regulations 3
H Updating Quality Manual to API Q1 Service Industry Specific Topics 4
R Electrical contractor Project Quality Management Plan Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 1
D Supplier Quality - How to classify a supplier level Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 7
R China Quality Certification Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 1
S Quality management system (Well head installation & maintenance) Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 5
V Quality review Meeting with Customer for complaints we received Customer Complaints 6
F Supplier Quality Assurance Job Openings - 8/2020 Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
G Copy of withdrawn ISO 9001:1994 Quality Management Standard ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
C Quality, efficiency and effectiveness of daily work routines Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
P How to develop executable quality management system for rookies? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
Q Quality Technician (calibration / metrology) - Memphis, TN Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 1
M Requirement to manufacture under a quality management system EU Medical Device Regulations 4
G Need to change KPI we called NC parts (maximum 3%.) to FTQ (first time quality) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
Ajit Basrur FDA News Harmonizing and Modernizing Regulation of Medical Device Quality Systems (7-2020) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
J Interview with Director of Quality Career and Occupation Discussions 18
A IATF 16949 4.3.1 - Determining the scope of the quality management system - supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
B Quality manual for automotive industry wanted Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 2
M Quality management certification required by Health Canada Canada Medical Device Regulations 3
A Building up a global quality management system ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A Building up a global quality management system 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
S Looking for Quality Content to Build Medical Device Curriculum - Concept to Commercialization Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
M Quality Metrics Questions Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
F Quality manual for trading company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
John Broomfield Informational Terms used in quality management [Deleted] Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 6
D Imaging/Image Quality Standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
D Quality Team Structure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
V Quality Objectives - ISO 9001 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
E Best way to keep up with pharmaceutical quality knowledge and current affairs Service Industry Specific Topics 1
C Quality assurance in Pharmacovigilance Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
I Quality Policy and Objectives examples Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 4
Miner Quality checks of product QR codes FMEA and Control Plans 2
S ISO 13485 Lead Auditor - Debate between our Quality Team and Regulatory Auditor - Internal Auditor Training ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 17
M Operational (free) simulation games for manufacturing and quality Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 5
I Help: QFD House of Quality Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
F Risk for Quality Assurance Department in a Hospital - Hospital Incident Reporting ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
I New to LEAN but not to Quality - How to run Kaizen events Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 1
T Ideas for developing a Supplier Quality Management System, non automotive ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
S SOP for ISO 13485:2016 Quality related Software validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
S Cost of Poor Quality (CoPQ) - Scrap element of calculation includes lost margin? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 7
S Quality manager considering data science Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 19
M Specific Values of Quality Objectives Benchmarking 7
J How to make Quality Control plans Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5
P VDA AIAG FMEA - Slides for Quality Audience FMEA and Control Plans 4
T Question about Quality Department employee position titles Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 10
C Quality Manager vs Warranty (service) Manager - Authorities & Responsibilities Customer Complaints 2
S Proposed Quality Improvement - Thoughts? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
K A proposal for the model Quality Management - I need help for the project ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom