Electronic wedge brakes will change the way we stop

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Leader
Admin
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061109/FREE/61106011/1065

Super Binders
Electronic wedge brakes will change the way we stop
aw_spacer.gif

By GREG KABLE
aw_spacer.gif

AutoWeek | Published 11/09/06, 8:37 am et
Never heard of the EWB or electronic wedge brake? Don’t worry. Chances are you’ll be hearing a lot about it in coming years.

That’s the opinion of German electronics specialist Siemens, which claims the high-tech stoppers, currently being tested for use on upcoming models by Europe’s leading carmakers, will revolutionize the safety standards of future generations of road cars by dramatically shortening stopping distances compared with more traditional hydraulic braking systems.

Efforts to improve the efficiency of braking systems have led to some interesting innovations in recent years, including the use of ceramic carbon materials in brake discs and electronic activation of parking brakes. But those developments will seem minor compared to the leap Siemens is claiming for its new electronic wedge brake.

Not to be confused with the electrohydraulic Sensotronic brakes introduced by Mercedes-Benz in 2001 but subsequently removed from sale early this year due to unsolved reliability issues, the electronic wedge brake represents a bigger breakthrough. The idea behind the system is not exactly new, with similarities to the arrangement found on horse-drawn carriages from the 18th century, where a wedge was used to bring the wheel to a standstill. But rather than relying on a hardened piece of wood for a binder, the electronic wedge uses state-of-the-art electronics and an innovative wedge-shaped connection to provide the sort of stopping ability that existing hydraulic units cannot match.

Unlike today’s traditional hydraulic brake, which requires the buildup of forces before the caliper is able to grip the disc, the electronic wedge brake uses a series of interlocking triangular teeth that offset between the caliper and the disc. In all, it is claimed to require just one-tenth the energy used by hydraulic braking. A small electric motor pushes the pad toward the rotor by a lateral movement—much like how a watermelon seed can be ejected at high velocity by squishing it between your fingers. The entire system runs on the standard 12-volt electrical system found in most cars.

Really clever, however, is that the kinetic energy of the car automatically increases the braking performance. In theory, the faster you are traveling when the brakes are applied, the more powerful they become. When the pad is applied to the disc, the momentum of the rotating disc draws the pad farther up an interlocking series of wedges, applying greater braking pressure and increasing stopping efficiency.

A series of electric motors push in and pull out at an extremely high frequency, while a torque sensor controls the braking force and keeps the wheels from locking up, thus alleviating the need for a conventional antilock braking system. With each brake unit operating independently from the others, it also means the electronic stability control can be programmed to operate on a much finer calibration, without the typical pulsating effect evident in some cars today.

In tests, a prototype with the wedge brakes regularly required less than half the distance to come to a complete stop than the prototype with the standard brakes, a company official said.

As well as providing greatly improved braking ability, wedge brakes are significantly lighter than today’s most advanced hydraulic units. With fewer moving parts, they also could be more reliable and last longer.

When will we see the new brakes begin filtering through to the road? Sources say the first car with wedge brakes, an Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz or Porsche, is planned for launch in 2008.
bilde
http://javascript<b></b>:var n=1
 
C

chergh - 2008

Is this really going to improve safety?

If I am travelling behind one of these cars and they hit their brakes suddenly I am likely to go into the back of them, I would be interested to see if leaving a two second gap between a car with 4 brake drums and a car with this new system is still enough.

Also as breaking time is also going to be reuced isn't there more risk of injury from sudden decceleration?

While this system has undoubted benefits it would also seem to introduce new risks. Have any of these risks been addressed by the manufacturers?
 
C

Craig H.

I am also interested to see how well this system matches up with tire technology. As any drag racer knows, having the horsepower makes no difference unless you can apply that power to the ground ("hook and book"). Tire smoke = slow run. The same applies to stopping. If the decrease in tire rotation speed causes the tire to lose contact with the pavement, a skid results, causing longer stopping lengths and a possible loss of vehicle control. Not a good thing.

This was mentioned in the article, but it was not discussed to my satisfaction. If my present braking system can cause a skid, how will this new system improve my stopping power?
 
Two comments:
Anti-lock braking systems are designed to maintain the highest amount of static friction (a.k.a. rolling friction) at the tire-road interface. This friction force is generally higher than the kinetic friction (a.k.a. sliding friction) that occurs when the tires are not rotating (i.e. locked up or skidding). Once you achieve maximum static friction, by whatever means, what's the difference in how you get there? Without a braking system, I can lock the tires with the antiquated front-disc and rear drum system on my 6,000 pound van. Why do I need more braking power?

The conversion of the kinetic energy stored in a moving vehicle into waste heat via friction braking seems outdated to me no matter how high-tech and efficient the braking system is. Why would Siemens pour research and development money into a system that does not recapture all that energy for later use?
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Leader
Admin
Is this really going to improve safety?

If I am travelling behind one of these cars and they hit their brakes suddenly I am likely to go into the back of them, I would be interested to see if leaving a two second gap between a car with 4 brake drums and a car with this new system is still enough.
If we think along these lines, we should have prohibited disc brakes, power brakes, radial tires. Heck, we should have prohibited cars altogether. We should be riding horses and be limited to 1 HP per rider.


Also as breaking time is also going to be reuced isn't there more risk of injury from sudden deceleration?
If you are adequately strapped, you will experience no more than 2 g's of deceleration. If you hit the wall or that freaking 8000 pounds SUV, because your braking distance was not short enough, the deceleration could be 30, 40, 60 g's. You don't stand a chance.

While this system has undoubted benefits it would also seem to introduce new risks. Have any of these risks been addressed by the manufacturers?
In my unscientific estimation, it seems that the potential gains and benefits outweigh the risks tremendously. If it can be sold in a cost effective manner, compared to the $10k ceramic brake sets, it should be a no brainer.

The conversion of the kinetic energy stored in a moving vehicle into waste heat via friction braking seems outdated to me no matter how high-tech and efficient the braking system is. Why would Siemens pour research and development money into a system that does not recapture all that energy for later use?
Good point. But I believe that this new technology could be later on added to regenerative systems such as in hybrid cars. Actually because of the higher levels of deceleration, probably more energy could be re-captured.
 

Tim Folkerts

Trusted Information Resource
Two comments:
Anti-lock braking systems are designed to maintain the highest amount of static friction (a.k.a. rolling friction) at the tire-road interface. This friction force is generally higher than the kinetic friction (a.k.a. sliding friction) that occurs when the tires are not rotating (i.e. locked up or skidding). Once you achieve maximum static friction, by whatever means, what's the difference in how you get there? Without a braking system, I can lock the tires with the antiquated front-disc and rear drum system on my 6,000 pound van. Why do I need more braking power?

As I understand it, it's not so much that it provides stronger brakes, but rather that it provides more rapid response. There is some delay between the time you press the brake petal and the time the pads are pressed firmly enough against the discs to start decelerating the car. It sounds like this system significantly reduces this time, so that the braking begins sooner.

Also, the movines of anti-lock brakes that I have seen show visible changes in wheel speed as the car temporarily reduces the braking force to keep the wheels from locking. This time of temporary reduction in braking increases the braking distance (but it is still much better than simply locking the brakes and skidding). Because this new system reacts more rapidly, the temporary perids of reduced braking are shortened, so braking is improved.

Sidney Vianna said:
Good point. But I believe that this new technology could be later on added to regenerative systems such as in hybrid cars. Actually because of the higher levels of deceleration, probably more energy could be re-captured.

The regenerative brakes work by using the electric motors that normally drive the wheels as generators. Instead of turning the kinetic energy of the moving car into heat (as in normal brakes), the kinetic energy is turned into electrically energy, which recharges the battery. Any friction-based brakes (drums, discs, or these new wedges) would detract from the regenerative effect.


Tim
 

Crusader

Trusted Information Resource
The potential problem is that a vehicle that is designed to stop on a dime, will, but it is the car behind you that won't. That's right, you get rear-ended because the other guy behind you can't stop that good.
 
Top Bottom