All info is prior 2017
Is the lab using ISO 9001 as the basis of its lab management system? If so, search for a 2015 ISO 9001 management review. Broadly the same thing
ISO 17025-2017 Management Review reporting items - Inputs
- Thread starter gary853
- Start date
Is the lab using ISO 9001 as the basis of its lab management system? If so, search for a 2015 ISO 9001 management review. Broadly the same thing
I recall seeing this description of the difference from the previous version:
The management review requirements are essentially the same, however, the elements to review have been expanded, notably points a), b), d), k) and m).
Inputs to the management review are to be recorded and include information related to:
a) changes in relevant internal and external issues;
b) fulfilment of objectives;
c) suitability of policies and procedures;
d) status of actions from previous management reviews;
e) outcomes of recent internal audits;
f) corrective actions;
g) assessments by external bodies;
h) changes in the volume or in the range of laboratory activities;
i) customer and personal feedback;
j) complaints;
k) effectiveness of any implemented improvements;
l) adequacy of resources;
m) results of risk identification;
n) outcomes of the assurance of the validity of results;
o) other relevant factors, such as monitoring activities and training.
What is the Accrediting body not seeing?
The management review requirements are essentially the same, however, the elements to review have been expanded, notably points a), b), d), k) and m).
Inputs to the management review are to be recorded and include information related to:
a) changes in relevant internal and external issues;
b) fulfilment of objectives;
c) suitability of policies and procedures;
d) status of actions from previous management reviews;
e) outcomes of recent internal audits;
f) corrective actions;
g) assessments by external bodies;
h) changes in the volume or in the range of laboratory activities;
i) customer and personal feedback;
j) complaints;
k) effectiveness of any implemented improvements;
l) adequacy of resources;
m) results of risk identification;
n) outcomes of the assurance of the validity of results;
o) other relevant factors, such as monitoring activities and training.
What is the Accrediting body not seeing?
All info is prior 2017
Get your copy of 17025:2017.
All the things required for the management review are in section 8.9
Similar threads
