Kurt Smith
Involved In Discussions
I wanted to give an update on what I am doing here since this since it was a fairly active discussion.
I have gone back and created an Excel spreadsheet of all of the completed work order for this year. Including due dates, quantities, work start and completion dates, customer, and parts lost/defective. Now I have a dashboard of all of our work completion that can breakdown our on-time completion rate.
This revealed that our previous metric was being recorded incorrectly. Our actual on-time completion is well below our goal and we will most likely end up recording a formal corrective action. Going forward I will maintain this spreadsheet whenever work orders are completed, and as they are identified I will set aside late orders for evaluation. I pulled the last month of late orders and found that more than half of them are due to unrealistic due dates from drop in orders.
I picked this course of action because, while it doesn't provide any direct front end improvement, it allows me to track our progress without requiring the owners and other management to do anything yet. From the start my concern was them not understanding the value of an improvement effort and choosing to drop it before we could learn anything. This way I can build some momentum and showcase a tangible case for change before they are asked to learn a new system or break habits.
For now the immediate goal is to gather enough data about late work to establish our target and plan how to improve. It looks like it will be the drop in orders with unrealistic due dates. I know we won't turn down the work, so I am hoping for a way to establish with customers the difference between ASAP orders and orders with a specified due date. But I am not clear if that works with ISO 9001 Contract Review Requirements. Any advice on that would be greatly appreciated.
I have gone back and created an Excel spreadsheet of all of the completed work order for this year. Including due dates, quantities, work start and completion dates, customer, and parts lost/defective. Now I have a dashboard of all of our work completion that can breakdown our on-time completion rate.
This revealed that our previous metric was being recorded incorrectly. Our actual on-time completion is well below our goal and we will most likely end up recording a formal corrective action. Going forward I will maintain this spreadsheet whenever work orders are completed, and as they are identified I will set aside late orders for evaluation. I pulled the last month of late orders and found that more than half of them are due to unrealistic due dates from drop in orders.
I picked this course of action because, while it doesn't provide any direct front end improvement, it allows me to track our progress without requiring the owners and other management to do anything yet. From the start my concern was them not understanding the value of an improvement effort and choosing to drop it before we could learn anything. This way I can build some momentum and showcase a tangible case for change before they are asked to learn a new system or break habits.
For now the immediate goal is to gather enough data about late work to establish our target and plan how to improve. It looks like it will be the drop in orders with unrealistic due dates. I know we won't turn down the work, so I am hoping for a way to establish with customers the difference between ASAP orders and orders with a specified due date. But I am not clear if that works with ISO 9001 Contract Review Requirements. Any advice on that would be greatly appreciated.