https://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/IATF-16949-FAQs_May-2022.pdf
FAQ#8 said:
It is important to note that the non-IATF OEM customers and other automotive customers may have customer requirements in an internal document that is shared with their suppliers (e.g. such as a supplier quality manual) or in a specific document available to the public (e.g. internet).
PFMEA, control plan, special characteristics, measurement system analysis, reporting of process design progress, process capability, dimensional inspection, product and process approval were examples of IATF 16949 related subjects covered by Toyota and Honda manuals.
FAQ#8 said:
Organizations are not expected to take the customer’s requirements, including customer-specific requirements, and convert them into a CSR format that aligns with the IATF 16949 clauses similar to what has been published by the IATF OEMs
Nevertheless I did it, when I worked for previous company in case of Toyota and Honda.
There is no other choice as do it for purpose of e.g. internal auditing.
I had to read and digest it and make available in fast food manner for internal auditors.
"This is process you will audit.
This process address following IATF 16949 requirements.
These IATF 16949 requirements have CSR embeded.
There is content of these CSR."
Alternatively I can say:
"There are two books, 300 pages each.
Read it, find references to IATF 16949 sections and audit it."
Totally ineffective and unprofessional.
Now, I still can't believe, that I have to do it for Top-10 worldwide Tier-1.
They are not enough competent to prepare ready to use CSRs for their Tier-2 suppliers.
40 pages to read ... including administration fees for nonconforming product delivered, to find e.g. CQI used for process audit.
