Al,
That's my issue. What about all the other FAR's and AC's and.....and....and! It would be endless. I sent this email (long) to my FSDO guy.....and he got fairly mad at me:
Hi guys,
OK, I'm having a difficult time wrapping my head around this Part 43 letter of compliance. I've never done one before for part 43 so I've done some investigation. Here is what I have come up with and was taken a bit by surprise:
The rule:
§ 145.51 Application for certificate.
(a) An application for a repair station certificate and rating must be made in a format acceptable to the FAA and must include the following:
(1) A repair station manual acceptable to the FAA as required by §145.207;
(2) A quality control manual acceptable to the FAA as required by §145.211(c);
(3) A list by type, make, or model, as appropriate, of each article for which the application is made;
(4) An organizational chart of the repair station and the names and titles of managing and supervisory personnel;
(5) A description of the housing and facilities, including the physical address, in accordance with §145.103;
(6) A list of the maintenance functions, for approval by the FAA, to be performed for the repair station under contract by another person in accordance with §145.217; and
(7) A training program for approval by the FAA in accordance with §145.163.
As you can see above, nowhere in the rule does it require any Letter of Compliance........However, the checklist and the PowerPoint show available on the FAA's website do.
After further investigation, I found this proposal that was issued by the FAA - FR Doc 06-9479 Dated December 1, 2006 (note, the proposal has not been implemented):
Sec. 145.51 Application for certificate.
(a) An application for a repair station certificate and rating must be made in a format acceptable to the FAA and include the following:
(1) A Letter of Compliance detailing how the applicant will comply with this chapter;
Section-by-Section Analysis
Subpart B--Certification
Section 145.51 Application for Certificate
The FAA proposes to add a provision to the application procedures that would require an applicant for a repair station certificate to provide the FAA with a letter explaining how the applicant intends to comply with the requirements of part 145. Under long-standing FAA policy and practice, repair station certificate applicants have provided this letter that the FAA refers to as a ``Letter of Compliance.'' Since the letter is an essential part of the application process, the FAA finds it appropriate to include a requirement to provide the letter in the regulations for application for a repair station certificate.
Here is ARSA's questioning:
If the FAA intended to obtain a statement of compliance only for part 145, it should note that there are many sections and paragraphs in that rule which are descriptive, proscriptive or explanatory; those sections or paragraphs do not require a showing of compliance.
If the FAA intended to ensure that the applicant and part 145 certificate holder know which portions of the quality system or training program documentation establish compliance with the applicable sections or paragraphs of part 145, it must clearly state that in the rule, the preamble and its guidance to the public and its workforce.
The FAA did not state any safety justification for requiring the letter of compliance. The preamble noted that it has historically requested the document, yet the letters of compliance previously requested only covered part 145, not the entire “chapter”.
Even if the industry has adhered to an arbitrary requirement of the agency that is not a justification for continuation. Merely stating that the letter is an “essential” part of the application process without stating why that may be so is an inadequate justification for any requirement, even a long-standing one. In order for the FAA to justify a requirement, it must have a safety basis and it must set an objective standard that provides guidance as to what is expected to show compliance.
While many of us steeped in regulatory compliance may “know” what is meant by the “letter of compliance”, anyone reading the plain words of the proposal would believe that all of 14 CFR would need to be reviewed to establish compliance with one “part”. Therefore, the current proposal is too broad.
Per the above FAA statement, it references "part" 145 and not the "chapter" which would limit the letter of compliance to only part 145, thus would negate the need for other or referenced parts.
On a final note, the FAA provides applicants with a "template" for the Letter of Compliance. It only includes part 145.
So here is my question, and I'm not trying to be a pain but rather trying to maintain continuity between the rule of a repair station and the requirements of the FSDO office.
If it's not a rule for a repair station to comply with, why is a part 145, or any other part, letter of compliance required? If it is required by internal FAA documents, then why isn't it made into a rule? The rationale behind this is because it is difficult for a repair station to be compliant with unknown requirements that are not officially documented.
Any help explaining this would be great, because my head hurts now.