We have quite interesting issue with one of our costumers who use IATF 16949. Recently we did calibration of one of their items. However, my laboratory is not accredited by national body but falls under CIPM MRA. Customer said it is not enough for them because due to Sanctioned Interpretation 10 the laboratory shall be accredited to ISO 17025. Of course we follow 17025 and system of quality was approved several times on international quality forum. Even my laboratory was peer reviewed several times, last in 2019.
Now the question. Is CIPM MRA is enough for IATF 16949? I think it has to, but how to interpret it and explain it to the costumer.
Now the question. Is CIPM MRA is enough for IATF 16949? I think it has to, but how to interpret it and explain it to the costumer.