BMU=CMC for every Calibration? ILAC Policy Clarification

C

crendfrey

#1
Greetings all,
I have a question.
First a little background.
My company is accredited to 17025 current addition, through an accrediting body which is a signatory to the ILAC MRA. This gives us the right to display the ILAC symbol on our accredited paperwork, which we do.
Now-as of 1/19/11 and effective 11/1/11 if I read the ILAC policy correctly, I must state the “estimated uncertainty” for EACH calibration.
The question is many fold.
1) Am I reading this correctly?
2) Can I make this a blanket statement similar to my scope budget?
3) I have had one customer ask for a MU on one scale in five years. Do I really need to do the calculations or can I just say I will provide them on request? (which is what I do now. I also provide MU for our proficiency testing and a few other internal documents for my own reference)
4) Am I making too much of this?
5) What do you think?

PS BMU now = CMC talk about confusing people.

Thanks in advance for your insight.

NOTE: ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC MRA - often referred to as the ILAC Arrangement)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#2
Hello there!:bigwave: Thanks for dropping by.

As to the requirement for stating the uncertainty, I'm not sure about that.

But I would be interested why you would not want to list it. Are you currently calibrating uncertainties for your different measurement processes? And, don't you have a published Best Measurement Uncertainty?

Saying, I would think you would have a collective uncertainty that would be applicable to the measurement process you are using for each measurement you are providing to the customer. That to me, would be sufficient to put on the calibration certificate.

To your point, yes, there are a lot of end users that don't understand uncertainty. Thus, they don't care. However, that is changing. That might be a good opportunity to educate the customer on it. Then, when your customers gets pressured for price issues or whatever by their superiors, they can then defend the value of the work they receive from you, based on the quality of the data you provide.

Not sure if that helps or addresses your issue.:)
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
Actually, yes, you are supposed to report uncertainty for every calibration - HOWEVER - ANS/ISO/IEC 17025:2005 in Clause 5.10.4.1.b allows use of an "accepted metrological specification" such as in the US, the 4:1 Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR).

Also, marketplace reality is that many labs offer multiple levels of certificates, starting from a very basic to full accreditation-compliance.

If you use the 4:1 remember you must have the uncertainty studies to support the statement.

The labs that are successful with reporting for every calibration typically have the information built into the software that they use.
 
C

crendfrey

#4
Thank you gentlemen,

Ok….. I have been hanging my hat on 5.10.3.1 c

c) “where applicable, a statement on the estimated uncertainty of measurement; information on uncertainty is needed in test reports when it is relevant to the validity or application of the test results, when a customer's instruction so requires, or when the uncertainty affects compliance to a specification limit;”

I make reference to the standard’s traceability, methods, state, local, fed requirements 17025 requirements etc.

BMU based on the normal 95% confidence, K2 statement and will supply actual MU on request.

Does not 5.10.4.1 b fall within the above statements?
b) “the uncertainty of measurement and/or a statement of compliance with an identified metrological specification or clauses thereof;”
In order to calculate an accurate MU I need to add 10 more weighments.
My standard accredited calibration report consists on 16 as found weighments.

This is cost prohibitive.

Given the state of the industry, people do not want to pay for something they do not care about.
All they want is a pretty piece of paper to show an auditor. Going prices are on a downward spiral and have been for several years. Customers always are governed by price. Very few understand the need for competent calibration. We do offer many levels of calibration. MU calibration comes with an additional cost. As in my previous post, 1 customer in 5 years does not warrant 10 additional weighments for all.

I have a heck of a time getting customers to even determine the tolerances for their own equipment. I cannot determine how much error they can accept.
It is a monumental task getting them to realize it is for their own protection with impact studies and such. (we calibrate as close to zero every time so we do not care what their tolerance is)

I definitely see the need for an uncertainty every time when calibrating mass.
In fact I require it for my standards.
We are talking scales here. 90% of which do not even require class 1 weights.

Thanks for your time and attenion guys;)
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Not every INCIDENT report will lead to a corrective action EU Medical Device Regulations 6
T AS9100D Clause 10.2.1g Supplier Corrective Action for each and every nonconformity? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
J Can signed agreements over-ride review of every "contract" under ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D Change Approval Requirements - Does every change need formal customer approval? Design and Development of Products and Processes 17
C ISO 13485 :2016 - CAPA - Does every CAPA need to be checked by regulations? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
V Supplier wants to perform pre-qualifications prior to every run instead of locking in parameters. Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7
M CE Mark and 510(k) -Global registration requirements for every country Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
D Are medical device companies required to document every change made to their website? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
D Does every piece of equipment used in a laboratory need to have an IQ protocol written and executed? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
V Every good documentation practice observation is an data integrity issue US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
E Does every metallic part have to be protectively earthed (class I ME)? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
R In a software development company: Is every bug reported by the customer a complaint? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 27
U SI 13 - Not Every Process Requires an Efficiency Measure IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
Howard Atkins MSAs are now required on every feature of the control plan - IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
K Is evidence of second party audits required for every supplier? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Interpretation or Definition of ‘Once Every 5 Days’ ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
A Defect Rate for asking for an RMA - Company wants an RMA for every defect found Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 10
A Is normal for FORD EU ask for the PSW every year APQP and PPAP 5
A Identifying context for every process in an organization ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 43
J Is it sufficient to send in my instruments for calibration every second year? Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
U Must every procedure be proceeded by a policy? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
A Personal names in docs - Goes against every documenation practice I know! Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 30
D Anyone Practicing Approval Signatures on Every Page of a Doc? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Conduct Customer Satisfaction Survey for every submitted Bid? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
I Run a batch every year to revalidate the validated condition? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
O Is a full Internal Audit cycle every year required? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
A Is it mandatory to revise MSDS every three years? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
L Does every document on a project require a document number? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
P Audit Design Process every Surveillance Audit - AS9104 Requirement? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
Ajit Basrur 10 Things Extraordinary People Say Every Day Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
K Autoclave Log - Do we have to monitor the usage for every load? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Y Must every Process have a Quality Objective? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 21
A Addressing every clause in ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
N New to ISO 9001 - NCR for every defect? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
A Do controlled documents require a signature on every page as per 21 CFR 820.40? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
D Are signatures required on every page of a controlled document? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
K Customer issues invalid SCAR and Chargeback every March Customer Complaints 6
F Is every activity required to be mentioned in BSC strategy map ? Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
C Does every procedure need to be included within a policy? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
J Does Every Staff need to read the ISO9001 Quality Manual from Cover to Cover? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
A Shall we raise SCAR/CAR for every defect as per our current procedure? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
Q 510K Checklist that considers every Design Change 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
V Do I need dimensionals performed for PPAP for every revision change? APQP and PPAP 2
E Every US state has Medical Device Regulations beside FDA Regulations Other US Medical Device Regulations 11
T Living Documents which change every day - Control or Uncontrolled? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
Q Drawing Review Records Required for every Drawing (Print)? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
A Process Objectives and Metrics - Should every documented process have objective? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
T Is a Nonconformance Report required for every Customer Complaint? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
K Must every CCP (Critical Control Point) have a (documented) procedure? Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 4
Q Does 21 CFR 820 really revise every year? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom