Just published Dead link removed - Was: https://www.aiag.org/files/PPAP4ErrataSheet_July06.pdf - PPAP 4th Errata Sheet
Corrections to the 4th edition PPAP handbook - July 2006
- Thread starter Howard Atkins
- Start date
Re: And here are some corrections to the 4th edition PPAP handbook
That's cause I get up when you go to sleep
howste said:
That's cause I get up when you go to sleep
F
favqty
Re: And here are some corrections to the 4th edition PPAP handbook
Howard,
Thanks for the info. I am wonder if the ISO/TS 16949:2002 have a document like this one?, If you have it, could you post it?. Thanks in advance
FAV
Howard,
Thanks for the info. I am wonder if the ISO/TS 16949:2002 have a document like this one?, If you have it, could you post it?. Thanks in advance
FAV
Re: And here are some corrections to the 4th edition PPAP handbook
There is and here is the link
DEAD LINK - Was: https://www.aiag.org/quality/3c_TS_2002ErrataSheet.pdf - Corrected Version 2003-12-15. Current copies of ISO/TS 16949:2002 are still current provided you have the four errata that were issued by ISO and the IATF. You can download the errata.
There is and here is the link
DEAD LINK - Was: https://www.aiag.org/quality/3c_TS_2002ErrataSheet.pdf - Corrected Version 2003-12-15. Current copies of ISO/TS 16949:2002 are still current provided you have the four errata that were issued by ISO and the IATF. You can download the errata.
Last edited by a moderator:
S
sunseasky
Thanks a lot ,it`s very help for me.Have a good day 
I Love AIAG, maybe somone should audit their manuals before they release them! 
Have they release a manual yet that has not contained errors? I spent a whole afternoon once trying to figure out why I could not make something add up as the SPC manual had stated. Turns out it was the manual that was wrong and in terms of the OLD SPC manual (1st ED) you could spend a day downloading and printing out the Errata sheets!
Bit of a poor show if you ask me from people who print guides on good quality practices, but hey, I don't know if they are all simple errors or complex developments.
We all make mistakes I suppose!
Have they release a manual yet that has not contained errors? I spent a whole afternoon once trying to figure out why I could not make something add up as the SPC manual had stated. Turns out it was the manual that was wrong and in terms of the OLD SPC manual (1st ED) you could spend a day downloading and printing out the Errata sheets!
Bit of a poor show if you ask me from people who print guides on good quality practices, but hey, I don't know if they are all simple errors or complex developments.
We all make mistakes I suppose!
Similar threads
