Dear all
I have a question related to interpretation of 60601-1, Figure J.5.
Our device is a body worn, 4.2V rechargeable battery operated device.
The design of the device makes it impossible to recharge it when in use on the patient, and this will be re-enforced in the IFUs.
It has no PATIENT CONNECTION, however the risks analysis shows that the charging connector itself might come in contact with the PATIENT in normal conditions.
As Figure J.5 suggests, do we need to provide 2 MOPPs between the internal electronics ( / the battery itself) and the charging connector (considered as an APPLIED PART as conclusion of the risks analysis) ?
If so, is it enough to justify that:
1 - The internal charging circuit comprises a diode, preventing reverse current flowing back from the battery to the connector, through this circuit
2 - Would 1 fail in SFC, and considering the test conditions of Figure 15, both the positive and negative pins of the charging connector would be shorted during the test, that this would short the battery, and PCM of the battery would then switch the device off (the battery is 62133-2 certified and tested for shorts both at pack and cell levels)
Could 1 and 2 be considered as the required MOPPS ?
Thanks, François
I have a question related to interpretation of 60601-1, Figure J.5.
Our device is a body worn, 4.2V rechargeable battery operated device.
The design of the device makes it impossible to recharge it when in use on the patient, and this will be re-enforced in the IFUs.
It has no PATIENT CONNECTION, however the risks analysis shows that the charging connector itself might come in contact with the PATIENT in normal conditions.
As Figure J.5 suggests, do we need to provide 2 MOPPs between the internal electronics ( / the battery itself) and the charging connector (considered as an APPLIED PART as conclusion of the risks analysis) ?
If so, is it enough to justify that:
1 - The internal charging circuit comprises a diode, preventing reverse current flowing back from the battery to the connector, through this circuit
2 - Would 1 fail in SFC, and considering the test conditions of Figure 15, both the positive and negative pins of the charging connector would be shorted during the test, that this would short the battery, and PCM of the battery would then switch the device off (the battery is 62133-2 certified and tested for shorts both at pack and cell levels)
Could 1 and 2 be considered as the required MOPPS ?
Thanks, François