J
JaneB
I can't agree that ISO 9000 is 'irrelevant' to 9001, Howard. I hope this doesn't sound overly picky (and perhaps I'm inferring a meaning that you didn't intend).
Au contraire, ISO 9000 is part of the 9000 suite of documents (as indicated by its number) and useful - eg, to check the definitions that are being used of terms in 9001 for example. (Which is much better than people guessing or making up their own.)
And the official line on this says "It is highly recommended that you use ISO 9000 to become familiar with the basic concepts and the language used before you adopt ISO 9001 to achieve a first level of performance. "
Now, I don't actually agree with that 'highly recommended' either - I think starting out by reading all of ISO 9000 is rather a big ask and a lot to try to digest (I wouldn't and if I should ever feel a slight urge to do so would lie down until it passed; I only use it as a reference when needed).
But I don't and can't accept that it is 'irrelevant'.
Au contraire, ISO 9000 is part of the 9000 suite of documents (as indicated by its number) and useful - eg, to check the definitions that are being used of terms in 9001 for example. (Which is much better than people guessing or making up their own.)
And the official line on this says "It is highly recommended that you use ISO 9000 to become familiar with the basic concepts and the language used before you adopt ISO 9001 to achieve a first level of performance. "
Now, I don't actually agree with that 'highly recommended' either - I think starting out by reading all of ISO 9000 is rather a big ask and a lot to try to digest (I wouldn't and if I should ever feel a slight urge to do so would lie down until it passed; I only use it as a reference when needed).
But I don't and can't accept that it is 'irrelevant'.