M
Mjtaur
Hello all,
This might sound like a ridiculous question but here is the scenario:
Company has three processes: Management, Manufacturing and Purchasing.
Only Manufacturing and Purchasing have PEARs.
However, the QM process maps ARE interactions of all activities, but not titled, nor are the specifically just Manufacturing, Management or Purchasing. As a matter of fact, they are titled Quality Process map, Manufacturing Process map and Detailed Manufacturing Process Map. This leads me to believe those are our processes. But they are not. But again, the interaction is there.
I'm new to the company and have never seen it like this before. They have always passed audits like this, it just doesn't seem to fit. Should we not have specific maps, specifically for each process? Or does it matter, so long as the interactions are there? Does anyone have any advice or suggestions that can help? It would be greatly appreciated for any insight.
This might sound like a ridiculous question but here is the scenario:
Company has three processes: Management, Manufacturing and Purchasing.
Only Manufacturing and Purchasing have PEARs.
However, the QM process maps ARE interactions of all activities, but not titled, nor are the specifically just Manufacturing, Management or Purchasing. As a matter of fact, they are titled Quality Process map, Manufacturing Process map and Detailed Manufacturing Process Map. This leads me to believe those are our processes. But they are not. But again, the interaction is there.
I'm new to the company and have never seen it like this before. They have always passed audits like this, it just doesn't seem to fit. Should we not have specific maps, specifically for each process? Or does it matter, so long as the interactions are there? Does anyone have any advice or suggestions that can help? It would be greatly appreciated for any insight.