I
infraredmed
Hi all,
Looking for suggestions on the best way to approach defining that our medical device has NO Essential Performance.
Our device which we're seeking 60601 Ed. 3 certification for is essentially a surgical camera for streaming and capturing digital and infrared images. It is non-diagnostic, non-radiating, non-contacting, non-monitoring and is simply meant to record and capture images.
I believe it doesn't have EP because nothing that it does or provides translates to patient care. Absence or degradation of the device, whether it is completely non-functional or functioning but providing poor quality images, doesn't present unacceptable risk. However, absence or degradation of the device would prevent it from achieving the intended use of streaming and capturing images.
So, what it boils down to is whether or not the NRTL looks at EP as 1) freedom from unacceptable risk or 2) achieving intended use.
Anyone have suggestions on how to approach this? Is my rationale correct?
Thanks!!
Looking for suggestions on the best way to approach defining that our medical device has NO Essential Performance.
Our device which we're seeking 60601 Ed. 3 certification for is essentially a surgical camera for streaming and capturing digital and infrared images. It is non-diagnostic, non-radiating, non-contacting, non-monitoring and is simply meant to record and capture images.
I believe it doesn't have EP because nothing that it does or provides translates to patient care. Absence or degradation of the device, whether it is completely non-functional or functioning but providing poor quality images, doesn't present unacceptable risk. However, absence or degradation of the device would prevent it from achieving the intended use of streaming and capturing images.
So, what it boils down to is whether or not the NRTL looks at EP as 1) freedom from unacceptable risk or 2) achieving intended use.
Anyone have suggestions on how to approach this? Is my rationale correct?
Thanks!!