Do Ford, GMC, and/or Daimler have ISO/TS 16949 certification?

S

selcuk_sensoy

Hi !
I want to learn that if big companies have (General Motors,Ford,Daimler Chrysler and other automotive manufacturers) ISO/TS 16949 certification or they only want it for their suppliers?
I want your answers as soon as possible
Thanks
 
P

Puzzle

I know Jaguar, in the UK have TS2. I believe they were the first actual 'factory' to do so.

But then I am probably wrong. :D
 
D

D.Scott

selcuk_sensoy said:
Hi !
I want to learn that if big companies have (General Motors,Ford,Daimler Chrysler and other automotive manufacturers) ISO/TS 16949 certification or they only want it for their suppliers?
I want your answers as soon as possible
Thanks

The TS-16949 is written specifically for the tier 1 suppliers to the big 3. It would serve no purpose for them to be certified to the standard as it cannot possibly apply to them (unless they supply each other). The plants I have seen In the US are certified to ISO-900(x).

Dave
 

Attachments

  • 505249.jpg
    505249.jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 524
E

engjane

I am pretty certain Ford Dagenham in the UK has TS. They are an engine assembly plant (amongst other things)

Surely even a vehicle plant has customers and orders etc....so why cant they be TS?
Perhaps someone can enlighten me as its Friday morning and my brain is frazzled.... :confused:
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
I think the rule of thumb is sub-assembly plants can be TS 16949 which engine assembly would apply to, because they supply engines (terchnically a sub-assembly) to 'final' assembly plants where a car comes out the end.
 
T

Teri - 2011

Our local gm plant that is still QS 9000 is a sub-assembly plant, (they do not have cars coming out the door).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
V

vanputten

"ISO 900(X)" is no longer applicable since ISO 9002/3 are obsolete standards. We only need to refer to ISO 9001:2000.

It confuses me that we take the requirements of TS so literaly when addressing to whom the standard applies. TS 169649 is a international standard applying to all automotive industries (not just the "Big 3" in the US) and has a requirement that it applies to suppliers. I believe the benefit of TS can apply to the customer. Certainly the intent of TS applies to all automotive customers and tier 1 suppliers. Through the trickle down intent of 7.4.1.2 Supplier qms development, eventually tier 2,3,.... should be TS certified.

Yes, the way TS is written it can only be imposed on certian suppliers to auto customers. But it doesn't pass a common sense test that a standard applies to suppliers but not to the customer. The intent and Quality Managment Principles apply to all. Maybe this should be addressed in the next review of TS? TS looses value for me when it applies to the supplier but not to the customer.

Regards, Dirk
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Ford CSR Cpk/Ppk Requirements Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
Vader22 FORD CSR Gap Analysis Checklist IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
T Ford Q1 MSA - Virtual Site Visit Hardware Manufacturing and Related Processes 14
Dan Pare Ford CSR Update (FMEA's) - January 2022 FMEA and Control Plans 25
T Ford CSR for Internal Auditors 2021 Internal Auditing 4
Techilady Ford Special Characteristics Communication and Agreement Form (SCCAF) provides production requirements? FMEA and Control Plans 4
B Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 5
octavio tarango Informational Ford Motor Company Customer Specific Requirements for IATF 16949:2016 - 08 Jan 2021 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
octavio tarango IATF 16949 News Ford Motors Customer Specific Requirements Update - Nov 2020 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
C Ford's MMOG/le Template wanted Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
H FORD's project milestone acronyms Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4
R Ford Q1 Manufacturing Site assessment result Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
Ron Rompen Ford Method - Position Capability with MMC Modifier Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 14
M Ford Q1 Revocation Recovery Process Customer and Company Specific Requirements 5
A Is normal for FORD EU ask for the PSW every year APQP and PPAP 5
C A couple CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) questions... Esp. Ford & Toyota Customer and Company Specific Requirements 5
V What document to use to document Welding PV testing - Supplier to Ford APQP and PPAP 1
E Ford Phased PPAP and T2 timing APQP and PPAP 1
S Where to get Ford document FAP 03-111 FMEA and Control Plans 12
Q Ford's Q1 Score Prediction Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
V Ford Dimensional Tag Characteristics requirements APQP and PPAP 2
R Ford Motor Company new CSR document - May 2014 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
K Q1-Ford - Does anyone have any Q1 templates? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
Ron Rompen Ford Paint Audit Checklist Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4
S ASTM-D4000 & FORD "ZW" Call-Outs Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
S Dimensional Issues because of the last years FORD Recall Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
J JMP Gauge R&R with FORD MSA Data Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
A Statistical Software Calibration using Ford's "Sample Calibration File" Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
V Where I can find an AAR form on Ford Covisint? APQP and PPAP 1
Marc Ford is introducing an Aluminum F-150 Pick 'em Up Truck World News 1
V Webasto Ford Exceptions Form APQP and PPAP 1
Marc Ford - Self-parking technology called Fully Assisted Parking Aid World News 1
M Advise on R Chart with Ppk of 17.85 for Ford Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 37
V What Ford Phase PPAP Level should DV testing be submitted? APQP and PPAP 1
Stijloor Ford - June 2013 Customer Specific Requirements (CSR) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
T What innovations led to Ford's production line? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
Ajit Basrur On Henry Ford's 150th Birthday, His Greatest Insight Has Been Tragically Forgotten Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 11
D How long must we provide service parts to Ford? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
S Ford Motor Engineering Change Level definition Customer and Company Specific Requirements 6
C Will Ford accept AS9100 certification in place of ISO9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
R Ford SQDCME manual Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
D What is the Ford Troubled Supplier group? Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
V Ford SREA (Supplier Request for Engineering Approval) 2007 revision Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
C New Ford CQI 15 Rollout Requirement and reference to ESBC24-5005-AB IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
D What is a Ford Single Scale? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
J Ford changing their acronym for Significant Characteristics from HIC to CTQ Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
K How to fill out an SREA (Supplier Request for Engineering Approval) form at Ford? APQP and PPAP 3
G Ford - Type 1 Gage Study MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) acceptable? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
xfngrs What does the Ford Europe acronym ISRD stand for? APQP and PPAP 6
V Where to find FORD Specific PPAP Training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom