Maintaining manufactoring process capability

R

rui12524

#1
8.2.3.1 Draft ISOTS 16949:2002 says "The organization shall maintain manufactoring process capability or performance as specified by the customer part aproval process requiremts":
Well, imagine that i have a Cpk of 5.25 mentioned in the PPAP; So, i understand that i can't go below 5.25! What if i mention in PPAP (control plan) that (although CPK of 5.25 was achieved) cpk must be superior to 1.67?:biglaugh:
Best to all
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

D.Scott

#2
There was an IASG intrepretation on this point which I am sure will apply to 16949 as well. You will find it listed as C7. It states "The intent of this requirement is based on the maintenance of the process and not the level of the indices' value. To maintain (or exceed) requires two components:
1) Monitoring of the process over time to verify capability and stability; and
2) If the process is capable and stable, then to verify that the process meets the requirements as described in PPAP 1.2.2.9.3"

The fact that you had at one point a 5.25 Cpk is immaterial. You are required to provide product meeting the requirements.

Hope this helps.

Dave
 
L

Laura M

#3
Technically, yes, you need to maintain that Cpk. Which begs the question, why do so good in the first place, right?

But the theory behind it is that your PPAP parts are matched up with other suppliers PPAP parts, and a Cpk of the assembly is established. Variation outside the 5.25 Cpk parts you submit is not considered. So if you add variation, the impact is not known. It's that variation that "gets them into trouble" so to speak.

I know its theoretical, and difficult to accept if the costs of maintaining 5.25 are high, but that's the rules right now.
 
A

Al Dyer

#4
Jeez, did the customer let you define the spec limits!
:D

The initial study performed during PPAP is to get an idea about variation. Long term process performance is what is important and that should not deteriorate (sp) although it will vary.

Also, I see no difference in the thought process between holding a process at 1.67 or 5.25 if those are the accurate numbers. A process is a process and performs as designed when special causes are defined and removed.

I don't see the control plan as an appropriate place to put such a disclaimer, >1.67 is the industry "norm". Let sleeping dogs lay.

Plus, don't sweat it too much until the approved TS is released.:bigwave:
 
R

rui12524

#5
Ok, so what it seems is that i need a customer specification regrading cpk; we have some customers (although not in the auto business), that specifie cpk of 1.2 and 1.67.
The question is that we have a ppk in the PPAP process that's not a true cpk (at least i think so).
Just for the record, we make injected plastic parts! so, maintaining a cpk of +5 is unreall for most of the parts, as there is much variation that we CAN?T control (material and the sorts).
Comments?;)
 

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#6
Originally posted by Al Dyer
Jeez, did the customer let you define the spec limits!
:D
Believe it or believe it not this has happened a number of times.
If the distribution is good then we have had automotive customers, French and German asking us to give them tolerances that will give a ppk of 1.67 or in one case 2.0.
They have then changed the drawing for us.
I have also seen cases where the same part is produced by diferent suppliers each with their own drawing from the customer with their name on it and diferences in tolerances.
 
F

frank-h

#7
I know someone will be upset.

I have also seen where a part was given to two suppliers and after both have submitted samples they were given different prints. New dimensions and or tolerances so the could both provide better CPK numbers. Is it me or does this sound like the customer is over critical on the specs for both vendors. Both parts work! Why not one print that you can actually manufacture to.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
I Maintaining Technical Documentation under MDD and MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Maintaining Equipment Records - We use a manual system ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
B Main responsibility for Control Plans - creating and maintaining FMEA and Control Plans 13
P Procedure for maintaining Confidentiality And Impartiality in a Laboratory Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 2
G Maintaining of Performance during the Lifetime of a IIa Medical Device EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Crimpshrine13 Rules of achieving and maintaining IATF recognition - Determining audit days IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
J Software for maintaining of Technical files and medical device documentation(RA need) Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 2
B What is our requirement for maintaining the EMC series of standards? IEC 61000 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
JoCam Cost of maintaining CE Mark Regulatory Approval Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
A CE Mark - Maintaining Technical File and Regulatory Assessment CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
W Maintaining Component Traceability in DHR (Design History Record) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
V Maintaining an E-Record for Equipment Data Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
D Redundant BOMs - Maintaining a Reference Only BOM on our Top Level Assembly Drawings Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
D Procedure for Maintaining Industry Standards and Identifying Revisions Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
H Source for Compiling and Maintaining an EHS Legal Register Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 4
S Advice on moving QMS Documents and Maintaining Revision History Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 9
M AS9100 Rev C - Determining, Providing and Maintaining" Infrastructure AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
S Maintaining ISO 9001:2008 when Automotive Business is Slow ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
T Requirements - Controlling and Maintaining Sheet Metal Templates for Production Use ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
N ISO 9001 based Audit Schedules: Creating and Maintaining - Template wanted General Auditing Discussions 5
S What's the logical difference between maintaining & retaining records of review? Management Review Meetings and related Processes 10
S A question on Maintaining the Integrity of the QMS (5.4.2) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
C API Q1 8th ed/ISO TS 29001 Maintaining Responsibility for Outsourced Processes Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
S Quality Manual - Possibility of maintaining only SOFT COPIES Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 17
A Maintaining Dual Standards ISO 9001 and ISO 13485 - Contract Manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
T How many hours a week do you devote to maintaining your QMS? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
A Rechargeable Battery in Medical Device - Controling and Maintaining Batteries Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 4
G Calibration laboratory start-up - Maintaining the same ambient conditions General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
ScottK Maintaining an SPC program with reduced staffing Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
B Specifications - Maintaining current revisions Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
Sidney Vianna Maintaining Accredited Certification During the Global Financial Crisis Registrars and Notified Bodies 9
Colin Cost of Maintaining Auditor Certification (IRCA QMS Lead Auditor) ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 1
A Review and Verification for Maintaining Software Software Quality Assurance 10
Z Creating and Maintaining a Top Ten Poor Quality Supplier Performer List Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 16
T Plug Gages - How people are maintaining calibration on plug gages General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Q Production on Plastics Drums - Process Flow and Maintaining Cleanliness Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
apestate Advice on maintaining surface plate condition - Starrett crystal pink surface plate Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 14
gard2372 Implementation and Maintaining Lean Guide book - Seeking recommendations and reviews Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 10
A Maintaining traceability through our manufacturing process - Protective suits - 110 Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 1
G How is everyone handling TS2 Clause 8.2.3.1 - Maintaining Process Capability IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S Maintaining and tracking laboratory voltage standards - A2LA audit General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
H Maintaining Certification - Do you need to take the test again? Professional Certifications and Degrees 5
P TS 16949 Clause 8.2.3.1 - Maintaining Process Capability IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
R Guidance for 'Maintaining Compliance to 820 - FDA and ISO 13485:2003 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
E Procedure Numbering Change? Still the need for maintaining Level 1, 2, 3, documents? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
T Maintaining Process Control QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
M 4.9.2 Maintaining Process Control - Maintaining ongoing process capability QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 13
J Quality Plan for manufactoring products - Example needed IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D Questions regarding process validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D Question regarding ECO process, specifically for Life Science products and defining form fit and function ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom