Reported Post by Jim Wynne - ISO 10725 vs. 17025

[Jim Wynne]

Jim Wynne has reported a post.

Reason:

Can someone fix this thread? It was moved inappropriately because Hershal read 10725 as 17025. Probably best to move it delete everything but the OP.

Post: ISO 10725 - Acceptance Sampling for Bulk Materials
Forum: ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories
Assigned Moderators: Jerry Eldred, Hershal

Posted by: Jim Wynne
Original Content:

The original question referenced 17025; however the basic acceptable is ISO/IEC 17025; the US version is ANS/ISO/IEC 17025, and so forth.

But all that deflects from the question.

NO! It's 10725 that the OP is referring to, NOT 17025. Different standard!

 

[howste]

Re: Reported Post by Jim Wynne

Looks like Miner's taken care of it.

I saw this thread yesterday, and my first thought was "typo" also, but then I read the name of the standard and figured out it really was ISO 10725.

 

[Miner]

Re: Reported Post by Jim Wynne

Yes, I took care of it and will PM Jim.

 

[Marc]

Re: Reported Post by Jim Wynne

Thanks, Miner! I appreciate it!