SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

Should I send survey questionnaire prior to Supplier EMS Audit?

P

Puck81

#1
Hello,

I am new to the forum, but so far i have found the discussions to be extremely helpful as I go through a 3 year old 14K system i have inherited. After talking with our 9K manager, i found out he uses the site as well.

I am wanting to conduct some on-site supplier audits soon. In our Supplier Evaluation Procedure we first send out a survey with basic EMS questions, and at the end we ask if we have permission for an on-site visit. So far i cannot find any records of completed surveys, so i will be sending some out this week.

I want to conduct on-site visits to Heat Treat, Plating, Painting, Recycling and Waste handling facilities. Should i also sned the surveys to companies supplying us? We purchase a large amount of lubes, metalworking fluids and soaps from a single company which is somewhat local. Should i audit them, or stick with companies downstream from us?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

NikkiQSM

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
Re: Supplier Audit Question

If the materials you receive from those suppliers can directly affect the quality of your product - I would say absolutely!
 

Ajit Basrur

Staff member
Admin
#3
Re: Should I send survey questionnaire prior to Supplier Audit ?

Hello,

I am new to the forum, but so far i have found the discussions to be extremely helpful as I go through a 3 year old 14K system i have inherited. After talking with our 9K manager, i found out he uses the site as well. <snip>
Welcome to the Cove :bigwave:

The Supplier Quality Management invloves identifying suppliers who need to be audited based on the criticality of the products and for those suppliers to be audited, you send the survey form in advance.

Thus your systems should dictate if a supplier audit is required or not and not to be left to the supplier.
 
M

Michael.Anishton

#5
Yes. If that involves pointing out which you can really rely on and can still support your business and products competitively. Every business need to ensure that the quality of their products that come from suppliers are adequately in-line with EMS standards and legislative requirements. If you think having a survey questionnaire would help you too in the audit, then go.
 
B

buzzjaw

#6
:notme: Just a quick spanner in the works: Apart from your inherited management system where is the requirement for auditing your suppliers or subcontractors? It's one of the things I hate about ISO 14001. :mad: A 14001 certified company can effectively, continuing to comply with the requirements of the standard, subcontract the bulk of their work to another company and that company may have no environmental management system or take any environmental responsibility (apart from meeting legislative requirements).
 
P

Puck81

#7
:notme: Just a quick spanner in the works: Apart from your inherited management system where is the requirement for auditing your suppliers or subcontractors? It's one of the things I hate about ISO 14001. :mad: A 14001 certified company can effectively, continuing to comply with the requirements of the standard, subcontract the bulk of their work to another company and that company may have no environmental management system or take any environmental responsibility (apart from meeting legislative requirements).
I have been going through the standards over and over since reading this response.

4.4.6 basical states we should identify and plan operations associated with our significant aspects. We then establish, implement and maintain procedures associated with significant aspects by communication with suppliers.

Our Procedure "Supplier Evaluation" has the followling Scope:
Applies to suppliers whose work could have a significant environmental impact at GGM.

My new question is how does an EMS audit of a supplier fall into this? Do i still need this Procedure?
 

Helmut Jilling

Auditor / Consultant
#8
:notme: Just a quick spanner in the works: Apart from your inherited management system where is the requirement for auditing your suppliers or subcontractors? It's one of the things I hate about ISO 14001. :mad: A 14001 certified company can effectively, continuing to comply with the requirements of the standard, subcontract the bulk of their work to another company and that company may have no environmental management system or take any environmental responsibility (apart from meeting legislative requirements).
Any auditor who has some experience would look into this scenario rather closely. This would be a little unusual. Although a similar and plausible scenario is most companies buy some of their components from suppliers, and many of those suppliers are in other countries.

The first scenario, I would look at the requirements to control or monitor persons working for or on behalf of the organization.

However, the second scenario is very common, and is often used as a dodge - which was your primary point. That is much harder to police with confidence.
 
B

buzzjaw

#9
I'm afraid I can't answer that question. Ask yourself why are you auditing your suppliers. What is the requirement you are trying to fulfill? If there is no requirement except your own management system then you don't have to do it (although you will obviously have to update your system / procedure accordingly).

That said there can be a need (customer, legislative, etc) for your suppliers to meet specific requirements and in those cases you need to work out a process for ensuring that they meet those requirements. Could be an audit. It could be that they hold similar certification. It could be that they supply you figures for waste and carbon generation. It could be that they buy all their materials from sustainable sources. The choice is yours providing it is inline with the requirements.
 
#10
1. It is a good idea to send the questionnaire in advance to the supplier; my experience with this approach is that it helps the supplier to focus on issues of your interest and for you it helps you to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit.
2. As for auditing different types of suppliers, it may be based on the potential impact of their products and services on your activities, products and services or the volume of business that you have with the supplier. We followed the latter.
3. Please also bear in mind, however small is the business with the supplier, if there is a disruption of supplies from a critical supplier, your operations will be affected. It is in your interest to assess such suppliers at least for compliance with environmental legislation.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Whom should I send the FSCA (Field Safety Corrective Action) to? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
R When Is PPAP Required? What Should We send? APQP and PPAP 15
C Should resolution be included in uncertainty budget for digital caliper or micrometer calibration? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4
Ed Panek External Standards List - Should this document include previously revised standards? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T How should I approach REACH, CM, etc. as a job shop? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 18
A Should we assign the PRRC before the date of application of MDR (26 May 2021)? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
J UDI-DI how should we interpret Device version or model to determine if a new UDI-DI is needed? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance document to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
A Should I take an online course for a career in Occupational Health and Safety? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
J Should a Class 1 medical device with an option to measure body weight be considered Class 1m? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Should APQP/PPAP has its own section in a QM? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
S What should i choose for "testing procedure" characteristics? (N95) General Information Resources 0
P Should eIFU link per ISO 15223-1:2016 be added to labels out of scope of Reg 207/2012? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Which Sampling Plan(s) Should I Use? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
S Which department should prepare the control plan? could you show me a standard regarding to this matter. FMEA and Control Plans 17
J Help settle a disagreement: Should external providers of preventive maintenance be on your ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
N Master Samples - What should we be keeping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
G Supplier delivered recent PPAP, should he deliver yearly layout inspection? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
John Broomfield Vote - Should ISO9004 Become a Requirements Standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
A Capability Study - in the beginning of your career what should you have known about the tool Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
J Should Loading and Unloading be Included in Cycle Times? Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 14
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Should 510(k) Predicates be Actively Listed Devices? Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Organization merger. Should we keep two separate ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Companies that maintain your machine should be in ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Use of "Shall" versus "Should" in Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 26
D Class II medical device - When should a complaint be closed? Customer Complaints 6
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L Clause 0.4 of ISO 9001 and EHS - Where should I stop the inclusion of EHS in my QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Ed Panek Part 11 Self Certify Memo - What else should it cover? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom