Testing for Cracks - Molded parts which are very soft before they are cooked

D
#1
I'm having a problem finding a form of testing for molded parts which are very soft before they are cooked at a very high temperature to make them extremely hard. My question is; does anyone know of any test methods which can be used to test these parts for cracks when they are very delicate before they are baked?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

CarolX

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#2
Dawn,

I would suggest some sort of Non-Destructive Test (NDT) method. I am not completely familiar with the methods curently available, but it might be an option for you.

Carol
 
C

CJacobsen

#3
For comparison:
I am not sure exactly what the part is you have, however, I offer this scenario:

A client currently uses a gel type substance to fill a mold. After 24 hours the molds are tipped so the pieces are on a sheet (similar to a baking sheet/cookie sheet)only heat tempered glass. These pieces are soft at this point and susceptible to damage and surface anomoly. Touching them would damage them. It is necessary at this stage to bake these pieces to harden them, however, if there are any breaks in the surface (small cracks or splits in the skin) the pieces deform when heated. Since they cannot be touched, the whole sheet is passed under an optical magnifier where the parts are magnified about 100x and the surface of each is closely inspected. Since they are on a glass sheet, the bottom surface can be viewed as well.

Not sure if this helps you. I realize the application I describe may not even be close, but the similarities caught my attention.
 
D
#5
Thanks CJacobsen,
We are making a powder metal part which is very soft and easy to break. I need to find a test we can do to determine a crack inside the part before it is baked. They are baked on a sinter oven which means we have to put alot of parts through before we can test for this crack. Is there something out there that I can use such as eddy current, ultrasonic testing, etc. which will detect this crack earlier in the process. The part is soft enough that it will fall apart with alot of handling. (Thanks - you guys are great)
 
D

Drew H

#6
Eddy current will only test for surface cracks, and it sounds like you are looking for internal flaws. Certainly, ultrasonic will do that, but this is a method that requires contact and acoustic couplant. You might want to investigate an x-ray type procedure, as this will find internal cracks without contact.
Maybe there is some researcher out there who has a clever technique for your application - you might want to browse through NDT journals to see.
 

Geoff Cotton

Quite Involved in Discussions
#7
Folks,

As we all know 'you can't inspect QUALITy into a product. Should we not turn this problem around and establish the root cause of the cracks. We may then be able to engineer the problem out using DoE etc.

Geoff
 
T

Tim Mosher

#8
I am an asnt level III, so if you can give me some more information(part size, size of defect you wish to detect, and so on) I may be able to offer you some advise. I have worked with sintered powdered metal before.
Thanks!
 
T

Tim Mosher

#9
I have a little more time, so I will give you some more information. First, have you verified that the internal cracks are present prior to baking? In my experience with powered metal, most internal cracks are caused by shrinkage during the sintering process. It is indeed a tricky process, and one which does not lend itself well to most non-destructive methods. If your part is not large(less that an inch or so in its thickest cross section)a low power real time x ray system is your best bet. There are many companies which produce low-power systems(less than 75 kv) for inspection of food products. These systems scan product on a conveyor belt, which would minimize handling on your part. Also, most low power systems as found in airports will do the job nicely for you, and they have image enhancement software which can make detection more accurate. There are many considerations however when looking at this method. Part geometry, indication size, cost of the system,(you may be able to rent one)
training, safety, and so on.
I agree that the best thing to do is improve your process, however without a quantative method to measure the severity of the problem, process impprovement is difficult with this manufacturing process.
Any more questions, please let me know!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
I IATF Lab Scope Testing Qualification and Competency Documentation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
N Chemical Testing on Medical Devices - Solutions in a container closure system (bag) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Comparing data from destructive testing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
T Flammability testing Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 0
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
K When is Bioburden Testing Required? Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
K IEC 62304 - Testing Independance IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5
A ANSI/AAMI versions of 60601-1-2 and related testing requirements Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
C Surgical mask stability testing (CE mark) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Beliz Biocompatibility Testing for Laser Epilation Device EU Medical Device Regulations 2
C One Time Service Supplier - Temperature and Humidity Testing Service ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D IEC 60601-1 - Service life testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8
P Flammability Testing of Aircraft Interior Materials Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 0
N Usability testing required for FDA IDE (investigational device exemption)? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 3
E ASTM F2118 - Fatigue testing of bone cement - Changes between the 2003 and the 2014? Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
K Biocompatibility Testing - Multile products of different sizes and shapes US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
S Requirement to Conduct New Shelf-life Testing? (re-do testing for design change) EU Medical Device Regulations 3
JoCam Mobile Patient Hoists and Electrical Testing Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
T Interlaboratory comparison or proficiency testing in destructive testing of welded joints ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
B ASTM E18-2020 - Rockwell testing standard changes? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
U Medical Device Design finalization testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
Jane's Like-for-like critical raw material change qualification - type of testing/ number of lots required ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
J Conflict of Interest Registrar/Notified Body/Testing House Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
M Inter-operator Variability Testing - Requirements for EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S High voltage testing - ISO 17025 - 7.2.2 Validation of methods and 7.3 Sampling ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
M Production approval testing - Alternative ideas for Validation Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
JoCam MDL in Canada without Canadian Electrical Testing Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
T HF testing / Summative evaluation for MDDS class I necessary? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 2
K Diagnostic X-ray devices - Applicability of Biocompatibility Testing per ISO 10993-1 Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
K Sequence of testing in IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
M Workplace Drug Testing in 2020 Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 9
W ASTM F1929 dye penetration test - Validation for in-house testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
J FDA wants electrical safety testing on battery powered medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 11
S Internal calibrations - Part of an ISO 17025 accredited testing laboratory (Automotive) ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
T Qualification testing of Lead acid batteries Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 0
D Sterility and BioBurden Testing for Plastics ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
DitchDigger IEC 60601-1 subclause 5.1 - Adequate evaluation in lieu of testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
E Correct way to certify hydrostatic testing when it is not 100% (and Sample Size) Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 6
MrTetris Are GLP required for testing cytotoxicity and soil remaining after sterilization of MD? Other Medical Device Related Standards 8
D Design Verification - Is testing required? Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
M Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Testing - What Standard to Use? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
N IATF 16949:2016 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - How to approve the Testing Laboratory without accreditation scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
T Spirometer - Pulmonary Function Testing - ATS/ERS:2005 EU Medical Device Regulations 5
M 510(k) 10993 Biocompability Testing Other US Medical Device Regulations 15
C Sterility and Bioburden Testing - LAL passed under 0.5EU/mL Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
A ISO 17025 Requirement 6.2 - Department Manager Testing Qualifications ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
P IEC 62304 - evaluation of integration and system testing IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 4
H EO Sterilization Validation - Sterility Testing and Load Configuration Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
M What to do in SOP Phase of Head unit testing? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom