Tie in Context - Interested party - Processes

[Jim Green]

Here goes nothing: In the realm of killing multiple birds: Would this work??? Can these be all tied together???

Context of Org. External/Internal issues: Managers determine meeting criteria for OSHA and Bureau of Workers comp is Very important. monitored and reviewed! covered.

Interested Party: Managers determine that Safety and Health program (regulatory) is vital. It becomes and interested party. monitored and reviewed - Listing days without lost time accidents etc.

Risk assessment relative to our Processes - Part of Operations process: We determine that many accidents are a risk and give a high Risk number. Do Risk Plan...

Show all of this during MGR Review.

Does this make sense???? Would it fly?

 

[normzone]

Will it fly?

I'll wager that will depend on how honestly it is done. If the record shows evidence of an appropriate discussion and actions taken, it might have wings.

If you're just trying to touch the base for laissez faire management that doesn't wish to be involved, your auditor may not be impressed.

Don't ask me how I know this, the pain is too recent.

 

[Jim Green]

I understand... Believe me.. Oh, it will be documented alright. I will be gathering the troops multiple times before D-day.

 

[AndyN]

Here goes nothing: In the realm of killing multiple birds: Would this work??? Can these be all tied together???

Context of Org. External/Internal issues: Managers determine meeting criteria for OSHA and Bureau of Workers comp is Very important. monitored and reviewed! covered.

Interested Party: Managers determine that Safety and Health program (regulatory) is vital. It becomes and interested party. monitored and reviewed - Listing days without lost time accidents etc.

Risk assessment relative to our Processes - Part of Operations process: We determine that many accidents are a risk and give a high Risk number. Do Risk Plan...

Show all of this during MGR Review.

Does this make sense???? Would it fly?

Sounds good, however... Is this for a QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM or for OHSAS?

 

[Jim Green]

Andy,
It is for Quality Management system.

 

[AndyN]

Context of Org. External/Internal issues: Managers determine meeting criteria for OSHA and Bureau of Workers comp is Very important. monitored and reviewed! covered.

Interested Party: Managers determine that Safety and Health program (regulatory) is vital. It becomes and interested party. monitored and reviewed - Listing days without lost time accidents etc.

Risk assessment relative to our Processes - Part of Operations process: We determine that many accidents are a risk and give a high Risk number. Do Risk Plan...

Show all of this during MGR Review.

Does this make sense???? Would it fly?

Hi Jim. In that case, these are not in the context/scope of the QMS, instead, being in the context of ISO 45001 (when it arrives)

 

[Jim Green]

OK,
How about this?
Context, External issue: Regulatory Requirement for heat treated Skids must be used when shipping skidded material over seas. Monitor and review any changes to the Reg. Assess Risk

Interested party: CUSTOMER ; Customer requires skids on material that is going Overseas. monitor and review - How many times are they asking? any issues? Do we receive certs from skid manufacturer showing that material is treated properly? Assess Risk

I am trying to establish links to these requirements?
IE in ISO 2008 you could determine processes, create process measures that in turn would or could become your Quality Objectives!

Link Context IE external Internal issues - link - Interested party - link - process measure- link Quality objective.