R
Rezzi
Hi all
Having looking through the excessive amount regarding different interpretations, discussion and arguments regarding CA and PA, I must say it is somehow getting out of hand.
There are a trillion of different products for different purposes regulated under the ISO standards and regulations.
The manufacturing companies are of different culture, training, size and resources.
Therefore I cant see the possibility of only one single "correct" interpretation of the CAPA.
I would say if your CAPA process cuts costs, results in a better product/process, your collegues (and the registrar) are satisfied and the product is safe, then hey, good work, in this case the question about whether an action is correction, corrective action or preventive action of a more academic interest.
Having looking through the excessive amount regarding different interpretations, discussion and arguments regarding CA and PA, I must say it is somehow getting out of hand.
There are a trillion of different products for different purposes regulated under the ISO standards and regulations.
The manufacturing companies are of different culture, training, size and resources.
Therefore I cant see the possibility of only one single "correct" interpretation of the CAPA.
I would say if your CAPA process cuts costs, results in a better product/process, your collegues (and the registrar) are satisfied and the product is safe, then hey, good work, in this case the question about whether an action is correction, corrective action or preventive action of a more academic interest.