time for a chiphead powerbar!
Karen-Dawn,
I see in an earlier post that Energy thinks I may have something useful to contribute.
I will try.
(By the way, your name is really catching to me -- my wife is a Karen and her youngest sister is a Dawn!)
From your descriptions, my opinion is that you may need an electronic system based on something a little more powerful than Word and Excel. Your people are having to enter the same data multiple times, something that is never a good idea because every keystrove is an opportunity for error. (As my spelling sometimes shows!) You probably would be better served by using a relational database system (Microsoft Access 97 or later, as an example of one) and a set of purpose-designed forms, reports and data entry screens. However, setting this up is not really for the novice ...
I think the first step is to organize your information into two types - data that describes what the product is supposed to be, and data that shows what actually happened when each item was made.
- The data that describes the product is your specifications and tolerances, part numbers, revision date, contract numbers, NC instructions and so on. This information would be entered in the database by the responsible person in the office, and not routinely changed after that. It is more or less "permanent" information. When you create a procedure, form, instruction or checklist, the document can link to tables and fields in the database and automatically plug in the current data when printed. ("Print" can be to paper, but it can also be to another document, or to a PDF file.) Even better, in many systems the documents and forms can actually be stored in the database!
- The data that describes what happened includes the measurements made during production, and can be entered using custom screens. A typical sequence would be to enter a tracking number (which would then pop up the part specifications), and then the data. Calculations can be handled as well, so a separate spreadsheet may not be needed. at the end, the data is stored in the database, and can be retrieved as needed.
Setting up the database requires expertise with relational database systems. Creating the documents with links to the database requires experience with ODBC or SQL links. (Word's MailMerge feature is a simple example.) Creating custom data entry and viewing screens requires expertise with Visual Basic for Applications (assuming the database is Access.) And all of it requires time, patience and re$ources.
With a properly designed relational database system, you should hardly ever have to enter a data item more than once. Everything should be grouped in small units (tables) of organized and related information, related to one thing that stays the same (the part number?). A real database guru can probably explain it better, but here is a simple example:
One table contains the part numbers. That number links to other tables that have different information -- Dimensions, Revisions, Units_Made, Contracts, and so on. The dimensions table conains the part number (it has to, to allow the linking), the dimensions, the tolerances, and the current revision date (another link). The Units_Made table contains the part number (for the link), a unique tracking number (serial number?), and whatever measurement data was collected for that specific piece of stuff. And so on.
I usually think of a relational database like a special type of file cabinet. Open a drawer and pull out a file folder. That folder has some of the information you want, and it also tells you where to find other information. In an "ideal" system (as opposed to the real world that we live in) a particular piece of information lives in only one file folder. All of the other files that use that information simply have a pointer telling the system (you) where to find it. The big advantage is that if a change is needed, only one thing is changed, one time. The drawback is that is may take the computer a couple of microseconds longer to retrieve it.
Feedback time -- have I helped, or simply added to the confusion?