I have the luxury of being somewhat choosy w.r.t. whom I work with, but I'm never not surprised when someone tries to lowball me after an initial set of discussions regarding both the project and the expected rate. I've heard a lot of excuses, but I'm convinced for some people it is a cross between a negotiation tactic and a power trip... it's not like I come back and offer "well, now that I've thought about it... this will take 25% more time" or "How about I only give 80% effort?" or "How about we agree to only get 75% done?".
I've had a couple of recent conversations along these lines that really stuck out:
1) President/Principle owner of a startup has a firm calendar date that is highly aggressive with a set of things outside of company control, but with well known $$ costs on the order of $400M and a LOT of work to do to get to that point. Contract would be for 6 months max, with ability to end contract at any time (basically work-for-hire) any time prior to end date... and the President can't make the offer because he's hung up on what would be at most $15K on top of a pretty modest rate that his previous employees left his employ over!
2) Company needs (three) unicorns... looking for a triple-headed unicorn... obviously a LOT of work, reasonably well-defined contract scope but there will also obviously be some crossover into at least one of the other uncovered areas. Everything is agreed to, but again it comes down to "we took a closer look at the budget and we need the rate to come down $10/hour"... and I'm thinking that they probably needed a fourth unicorn to plan their projects/budgets. This was another supposedly well-defined project, so again we're talking about expenses on the order of $10K.
I've been (a spectator) on the other side... a company really flubs a project (years overdue, several million $ spend with nothing to show for it)... the company finds an external resource (team) willing and capable of tackling it and committing to a believable project plan (true deliverables, metrics and milestones) at a cost that is a fraction (significant) of the money wasted so far... then the company lowballs the offer and gets disgusted when the external team walks away. The company ended up spending more time and $$ than was externally projected to finally get a half-baked version of the original concept complete. This experience felt like "hey, we spent 4x the money and took a decade+, but now we don't have to share the credit!"
I've had a couple of recent conversations along these lines that really stuck out:
1) President/Principle owner of a startup has a firm calendar date that is highly aggressive with a set of things outside of company control, but with well known $$ costs on the order of $400M and a LOT of work to do to get to that point. Contract would be for 6 months max, with ability to end contract at any time (basically work-for-hire) any time prior to end date... and the President can't make the offer because he's hung up on what would be at most $15K on top of a pretty modest rate that his previous employees left his employ over!
2) Company needs (three) unicorns... looking for a triple-headed unicorn... obviously a LOT of work, reasonably well-defined contract scope but there will also obviously be some crossover into at least one of the other uncovered areas. Everything is agreed to, but again it comes down to "we took a closer look at the budget and we need the rate to come down $10/hour"... and I'm thinking that they probably needed a fourth unicorn to plan their projects/budgets. This was another supposedly well-defined project, so again we're talking about expenses on the order of $10K.
I've been (a spectator) on the other side... a company really flubs a project (years overdue, several million $ spend with nothing to show for it)... the company finds an external resource (team) willing and capable of tackling it and committing to a believable project plan (true deliverables, metrics and milestones) at a cost that is a fraction (significant) of the money wasted so far... then the company lowballs the offer and gets disgusted when the external team walks away. The company ended up spending more time and $$ than was externally projected to finally get a half-baked version of the original concept complete. This experience felt like "hey, we spent 4x the money and took a decade+, but now we don't have to share the credit!"