We use a skills matrix to see if everyone is properly trained on their jobs. Complicated?
Here's a potential and I'm surprised it hasn't been picked up on by your CB or maybe there's a communication breakdown here.......... Training is not the same as competence, and I'll use myself as an example.
I've an MBA (Finance heavy) and on paper I look like a whiz-bang financial expert, near 4.0 and all that dribble....It took us 5 years of payments to the IRS because of errors I made on taxes one year........Guess what I don't do now even though I'm "trained"? My lovely bride handles all out family finances, checking, everything and has so for 43 years because I'm a dud at it.
When you designate someone to perform a task, what evidence do you have that shows understanding and successful/effective performance of the subject matter of that task? Would you designate an HR person to sign off on a production task because of title or position rather that someone who has the needed background?
Competence = demonstrated ability to apply knowledge and/or experience (you've gotta be able to show this)